Launching….Rad Fem Central !!!

October 10, 2011


Not enough time in the day to follow all your favorite blogs? Pissed because you missed that great conversation on that seldom-updated blog you forgot to check? Click on RadFemCentral to instantly see which blogs have new posts, and to keep up to date with all your radfem news. Please contact me with URLs of blogs I have missed. All will be included equally.

As some of you know, I’ve been talking for months about an aggregate RSS feed for RadFem Bloggers. I finally got one started! But I need Your Help. I know I’m missing lots of sites. Please let me know which ones I’m missing, even if they are new sites, or sites which haven’t been updated in ages (that way if they DO update, we will all know about it because they will go to the top of the list). In weeks to come RadFem Central will grow in size and scope. And I may even pretty it up a bit at some point. I hope this will be a useful tool for all of us in the community to keep in touch, and support your overworked and under unpaid blogging sisters.

Also, if for any reason someone wants to be removed from the site, please let me know.

In Sisterhood,


P.S. Inclusion on RadFem Central does not mean the bloggers featured agree with the views expressed by other bloggers, or that I agree with all the views of a blog, or even that the site is purely “Radical Feminist”, rather that the sites are female owned and of interest to, and/or supportive of, some Radical Feminist ideals, etc etc disclaimer disclaimer blah blah blah. 🙂

*If anyone wants to use this little picture on the sidebar of their blog help yourself

114 Responses to “Launching….Rad Fem Central !!!”

  1. DaveSquirrel Says:

    Very handy, thanks GM!

    In checking it just now, I realise a few blogs that I checked just a few days ago have been updated, yay, so won’t sit here and yak, I’m off for a bit of reading!

    ~Squirrel out 😛

  2. smash Says:

    SWEET! Thanks. Nice job GM 🙂

  3. Stick It! Says:

    Please include if you would.

  4. ibleedpurple Says:

    Awesome. This is much appreciated.

    Perhaps ask Nine Deuce over at Rage against the Man-chine ( and Owl Eyes at Boner Killing ( about including their blogs?

    • GallusMag Says:

      Thanks! It’s basically a glorified blogroll, so I’m including everyone and letting them opt out if they don’t like it for some reason. Most of us don’t even have a contact address so that seems the most inclusive way to do it. I’ve never heard of asking to include someone on a blogroll, but if you think they may need to be asked first, can you please ask them and let me know? Thanks.
      (NO private blogs will be included)

      • kurukurushoujo Says:

        I’ve heard people asking others to include their blogs on their blogroll all the time – so I thought I better ask first. I’ve already contacted both bloggers, might take some time until I get a reply. I called it a “radfem collective feed thingy” or the like – hope that was alright.

      • GallusMag Says:

        Really? I’ve never heard of it. No one has ever asked me, and I’ve never seen it. Whatever you think is best. Thankfully I’ve gotten nothing but positive feedback so far. Appreciate the help.

      • GallusMag Says:

        It’s called a “BlogList”. The articles aren’t actually forwarded or republished.

      • GallusMag Says:

        I’m more concerned about accidentally leaving someone off and having them feel snubbed, to be honest. If anyone sees their blog was missed, please don’t hesitate to tell me. Any oversights are unintentional.

  5. sipiy Says:

    Is Rainbow Riot on there? Gotta get that girl!

  6. watergate Says:

    Yeeeeehaw! Awesome.

    You may wanna add RANCOM! if you haven’t already.

  7. Kathrin Says:


    Leaving a public comment because there [understandably] doesn’t seem to be a way to send a private message.

    This is an awesome idea, and I would like to say thank you. I try to keep Google Reader up-to-date, but there’s a lot going of good things being said, and it can be a pain finding and following the various sites authors come and go.

    I work with a small ISP, and if it would be helpful, we could set you up with your own WordPress install. There are some pretty cool plugins for feed aggregation. One plugin (FeedWordpress) is used to run , a site with some similar goals.

    • GallusMag Says:

      Thanks Kathrin. We’re good for now but thank you for the kind offer. 🙂

      • Sipiy Says:

        Is that the site that was started, or is run, by Feministe, bloggers who personify f***-me feminism, and one of whom a particularly virulent FtTrans with a looooong history of rad fem hate and recruiting young lesbian and questioning women into transing. Ask Lucky.

      • GallusMag Says:

        Kathrin is M2T also, but seemingly not the overtly hateful insane kind.

      • Sipiy Says:

        Yes, I know. I appreciate Kathrin’s posts.

      • Kathrin Says:


        It may be. I was speaking more along of the technical goals (RSS aggregation of a selection of feminist sites). It was an endorsement of WordPress as a blogging platform, not a recommendation of the site itself.

        I try not to be the covertly hateful insane kind either 🙂

        I find hate to be toxic to my soul, and do what I can to purge it. It’s what led me here, in fact. I grew up in an environment (Mormon, with male peers) that despised feminism as a threat to what was a “good thing” for them.

        Mormonism’s roots (polygamy, women as literal property to be traded and reassigned as gifts and punishments for men) are extremely anti-women. That legacy still sticks around in many ways. I wasn’t immune to the conditioning and socialization, but I work every day to lessen it’s hold on me.

        I can’t hate someone when I understand where they are coming from – what led them to their perspective and choices. I may have anger, and I may fight them to my dying breath, but it will be out of love, not hate.

        I sought understanding of feminism, and in it found truth. Being on the receiving end of some female-directed discrimination helped drive the point home, and show me that the picture of the world I was taught while young to be a load of crap. The world doesn’t consist of the forces of Political Correctness seeking to oppress men at every turn – in education, with “affirmative action”, and quotas, and false rape accusations without proof. This site, and sites like it, have helped be a smack upside the head when bits of my conditioning start creeping into my thought processes.

        As for the “insane” bit, well, I’m still reserving judgement 🙂 I know now that a lot of my problems were a result of oppressive gender roles and body issues ([sarcasm]not that any woman would ever know anything about _those_[/sarcasm]).

        If I had it to do all over again, I would try to find a better alternative. I don’t revert because of the harm it would cause others, with work, friends, clients, and most importantly the love of my life, most of whom have only ever known me as Kathrin. The cost and burden that transition causes on others can be just as strong (if not stronger) on the way back. I may be insane, but I try to minimize the harm inflicted on others where I can.

      • GallusMag Says:

        Yes, internalize your insanity and inflict it on yourself and not direct it outwards and inflict it on others – just like a good woman! (Said in a gentle teasing way with a smile). 😉
        Thank you for such a reflective thoughtful and openhearted comment.

  8. Sipiy Says:

    I see this in your blogroll, but not yet on Rad Fem Central. Always provocative.

  9. Bev Jo Says:

    Great work, as always, Gallus! Thank you!

  10. Branjor Says:

    Great site, GM! Bookmarked. I have already used it to check out other blog posts.

    OT: In the news: California passes 2 new transgender laws. One makes getting access to and changing birth certificates to one’s “current gender” easier for TG Californians. They must only provide documentation from an attending physician that they have undergone “clinically appropriate treatment.” The other deals with housing, employment and other civil rights protections.

  11. pmsrhino Says:

    Not sure if my blog would meet the RedFem muster. 😡

  12. KatieS Says:

    Thanks, Gallus Mag!!!! This is great, though I barely have time to read anything these days. But here are some I didn’t see on your list

    This Frenzy:

    Rooted in Being:

    Crunk Feminist Collective:

    I’ll add more if I see any that seem obscure and not on your list.

    • GallusMag Says:

      Awesome! Thank you so much for your help.

    • Noanodyne Says:

      This Frenzy has a series of posts up praising the work of MRA-lite Robert Bly — definitely not a radical feminist blog.

      Rooted in Being has posts up waxing poetic about male writers — that’s also not radical feminism.

      Crunk has been supportive of genderists in the past, I don’t know if they’ve had a change of heart. They still use “queer” as a positive attribute, which may or may not be an indication of genderist leanings.

      • sipiy Says:

        I sure don’t think we want to be giving them more traffic.

        And Witchy Woo? She does post very seldom now her advocacy being in real almost entirely, but her next to last post is a ringer for what we’re going through presently woith the *fems who have more fun than we do* (and before, and before that, and then earlier than that…). Newer rad fem bloggers need to know WWs blog.

      • GallusMag Says:

        Thanks Noan. I want to keep all the links away from fun-fem.

      • KatieS Says:

        Thanks for the heads-up. I have not paid much attention to the finer points of some of these things, so I don’t always know what to look for. I don’t want to give traffic to those who are in favor of these things either.

      • almostclever Says:

        Too bad me reading shit that men write got me taken off your site 😦 😦 Oh well, I was excited about it though! 🙂 I support radfem issues concerning the sex industry, and the truth is I don’t really know much about radical feminism, but I thought this was for women of many feminist types? Maybe you changed your criteria?

      • GallusMag Says:

        Hi Almost Clever- I took you off because someone raised issues about your site and I wanted to spend some time looking at it myself since I’m not familiar with your blog. My apologies for the confusion!
        The criteria are:
        Female blogger
        I should not have added sites without spending some time with them myself because once they are on there I have no intention of “policing” content (unless someone goes full-on fun fem/pro-porn or something -which I’ve only seen happen once- lol)
        I’m so embarrassed that you noticed you were on there briefly and then were removed before I have a chance to read your site! I’m so glad you contacted me.
        I’ll resolve the issue one way or another within the next day or so- again my apologies for the confusion and thank you so much for reaching out.
        ETA: RadFem Central is definitely NOT a list of general feminist blogs.

      • Noanodyne Says:

        Sorry if your feelings are hurt, AlmostClever, but here are your words about radical feminism:

        I am also learning that women who are against women being prostituted, the sex trade, and pornography – are actually considered Radical Feminists!

        Radical?! Are you fucking serious? That makes me a radfem?

        That saddens me. To be considered a radical most certainly means one is in the minority. That’s depressing. I thought the majority of feminists would be against such torture and abuse of their own kind. I am learning that I am wrong about that, one blog at a time.

        People were labeling me a rad fem, and I didn’t even know what the hell a rad fem is! And it is all because of my views of the sex industry.

        Fucking depressing.

        You might consider that women who proudly call themselves “radical” and “radical feminists” wouldn’t take kindly to casting the experience as “sad” and “depressing” and telling the whole world you think so basically puts us and our work in that light. I’m open to dialogue about this, but we’re radical feminists precisely in answer to all the fake feminism we’ve seen in real life (slutwalk) and online (Feministe, which you link to in your blogroll).

      • almostclever Says:

        If that is your criteria, I certainly meet it 🙂 If you cruise my blog posts you’ll see that. Look forward to reading and meeting some awesome women through this site.



      • GallusMag Says:

        @Noan I took that to mean that it is with some surprise that almostclever has discovered that her feminist beliefs, which she arrived at independently, are classified as “radical”, when she sees anti-porn anti-trafficking, anti-gender as views which should be considered mainstream and foundational to any women’s liberation movement. Strikes me as someone who is new to radical feminism, but whose beliefs are aligned. And I must say I’m inclined to be inclusionary rather than exclusionary. If almostclever had not written to me I likely would have taken a “wait and see” attitude, but as it is I will take some time and read her site myself- unfortunately I am horribly busy today, but will soon. I could really just kick myself for not vetting recommended sites more carefully before adding. Oh well, a learning experience. I do deeply apologize.
        Noan I do appreciate the feedback- the last thing any of us want is a diluted “fun-fem” list. Apologies all around for my stupidity.

      • GallusMag Says:

        Also: Noan’s comment was still in mod when AC left her latest comment, so she did not see it.

      • almostclever Says:

        @ Noan,

        I can tell you are passionate and protective of radical feminist issues and do not want to be “infiltrated” or “diluted” (for lack of a better word).

        If you look further into my comments section on that post you quoted, you will see you are mistaken in your assessment of me. Your interpretation is hysterically incorrect.

        I’m not going to fight to be somewhere I am not wanted, so no worries – but I do not appreciate being discredited and accused falsely of being a label that I do not identify with.

        I am not sure what “funfem” means to you, but if it means communicating with and reading stuff from men, then you most probably are not going to like me. I am someone who counsels women and men on sexual abuse/assault and sex trafficking issues. I work with men, I am married to a man – that may disqualify me in your eyes?

        Anyways, I would ask anyone who is interested in social work, domestic violence and sexual abuse, anti-trafficking, anti-gender, anti-porn, cultural competence and other feminist and world issues – to please stop by. These are all issues that I am passionate and care very much about.

        Thank you and I will respectfully bow out now. I don’t need to prove myself anymore to be added to a site that I mistakenly believed was open to “someone like me.”

      • GallusMag Says:

        Always Clever- I haven’t had to time to check out your whole blog but I did take a look, and I must say I found it very interesting, and quite radical. I look forward to reading more of it and following your new posts.
        Sorry about the mix-up, and thank you for your patience with me, I appreciate it.

      • GallusMag Says:

        Obviously I’m adding you to the blog list if that wasn’t clear. A wonderful addition.
        We don’t all have to – and maybe shouldn’t- agree. If a blog is
        and Female
        it will be an asset to the bloglist.

        I will take steps to make sure this doesn’t happen again. Live and learn!

    • GallusMag Says:

      Thanks Katie!
      It looks like feministphilosophers is a group blog that posts multiple times a day. I might need to put a separate widget somewhere for blogs like that- so the same blogs aren’t always at the top of the list all day every day. So it might be a few days till I fit that one in.

      And just to repeat to everyone for the record:
      Females only
      I think everyone gets that tho- just stating it for the record.
      Thanks everyone for your help!

  13. KatieS Says:

    Oops, I think the Feminist Philosophers include men. So, it shouldn’t be on the list anyway.

  14. sipiy Says:

    A propos of nothing. I just figured out that’s not a jalepeno pepper for your gravataar. 😛

  15. sipiy Says:

    Would there be room for a section for blogs gone silent that are MUST reads … that many, many of the rad fems today don’t know about, would be knocked back by the FINE that was going on here just five years ago.

    Archive of the Biting Beaver

    Witchy Woo “I’ll go to the foot of my stairs”

    Just for two.

    • GallusMag Says:

      That’s the cool thing about it is that it arranges itself by date, so can act as an archive of sorts. The longer a site sits idle, the further back into archives it goes BUT if someone chooses to update their blog, even infrequently, it pops right up to the top of the list. That way new posts won’t be missed.

  16. Kathrin Says:

    Would it be possible to perhaps have a little more text from the articles to make it a little easier to scan through?

  17. GallusMag Says:

    According to the list so far, around 40 posts a week. That’s wonderful!

  18. ball buster Says:

    This is wonderful, and thank you for adding me! I am going to link to it as a permanent fixture on my blog.

  19. This is AMAZING!!!! Thank you so much, Gallus. But—if I make this my homepage, I will never get a shred of work done! 😛 Wonder if I can call in sick ’cause I’ve got an addiction to radfem blogs? 🙂

  20. sipiy Says:


    It would be great to have a female health issues blog on Rad Fem Central, if.

    Is there a blog dedicated to women’s health issues, from a non-industry supporting rad fem position that could be included? Not OBOS, who are trans supporting — choice, you see — nor their eponymous blog.

    I know of a few that are good for some women’s health issues, but not rad fem. For example, Gillian (osteoporosis) and Paula Caplan (women and psychiatry), Canadian Women’s Health Network (not rad fem or even, in most cases, feminist). Etc.

    So is their a rad fem doctor, or nurse blogging on our health issues from a rad fem perspective?

  21. Mary Sunshine Says:

    How about Sailor Calliope ?

    And the radfemhub itself ? (One stop shopping, y’know.)

  22. Mary Sunshine Says:

    Ah, sorry, you got ’em. That’s my failing vision.

  23. Kathrin Says:

    Had a quick go at a logo using a modified version of a template I have. I’m not a graphic designer by profession, but I tried to match the color (the orange color is from the opposite side of the color wheel).

    It’s a bit on the large side because shrinking is easier (and looks better) than expanding. If anyone likes it or wants to use it, I would be glad to provide it in any other sides.

    [Link Deleted-GM]

    Feel free to use it for any purpose.

    • GallusMag Says:

      I appreciate that you want to help Kathrin but
      1. I don’t ever click on or publish specialized links
      2. This is a Female Only project.
      NO input from males is desired.
      Thanks you.

      • Kathrin Says:

        No problem. I can certainly see where you are coming from, and it’s not particularly surprising.

        I was torn on whether or not to offer – in general, I try to help people where I can, but I didn’t want to offend or go where I wasn’t wanted.

        In the end, it seemed more appropriate to offer and let you chose, instead of just making the decision based off what I thought you would want.

  24. Excellent! And thanks so much for including me.

  25. Feuerwerferin Says:

    Yay! That’s great! As expected from you it seems to be a tolerant aproach.

  26. Signe Says:

    This will be a great resource for me. Thanks for putting it together!

  27. Sargasso Sea Says:

    I’ve started a different, new bloggie which could be included: Radical Resolution. It’s all linked-up through my user name. 🙂

    Thanks, GM for having the space!

  28. spindel Says:

    Great idea and thanks for the inclusion. A couple of suggestions:

  29. What about this blog? Just discovered it!

    Also has really good articles about porn culture.

  30. Sargasso Sea Says:

    Just to say that Central is kinda the best thing since sliced bread.

    Simple! Delightful!

  31. GallusMag Says:

    Thanks everyone! I will go through and add the new sites within the next day or two. Keep ’em coming!

  32. Noanodyne Says:

    I think it would be very helpful to have a discussion among all the radical feminist bloggers in our community about a recent posting by someone who is listed on RFC who has essentially launched an attack on straw-women radical feminists. Should such a person actually be called a feminist, let alone a radical feminist, and given the benefit of the doubt about where her loyalties lie? Anyone — even a woman — who sets up women just to knock them down, is no feminist. Anyone — even a woman — who makes things up about a group of women just to make a point, is no feminist. Anyone — even a woman who is doing good work in one area — who claims something about “radical feminists” that is demonstrably untrue, while offering no examples of what she’s referring to (but does offer a link to the radfem-dismissive dikipedia page), is no feminist. In fact, she seems to be saying that she wants nothing to do with us, so what do we say to that?

    • GallusMag Says:

      What do we say? Well who knows. All I can figure is that sometimes WE (bloggers) know what we mean to say, but when we type it out it ends up sounding like confused jibberish to the reader. Possibly a case of that.
      Regardless, I appreciate your thoughts but think I will decline hosting such a discussion about a specific post in this thread. Hope that’s okay.

  33. Lysandra Says:

    I like this idea! Can you publish the link to the RSS feed itself, so those of us who are reading blogs through aggregates like Google Reader can see the posts that way?

  34. Gallus, my blog isn’t being picked up by the feed anymore. I don’t know how it works, but I don’t think I’ve changed any of my settings.

    Also, while on tech queries, when I click on the “MisogynyProject” links in the feed it just goes to one line on a page and I can’t seem to see the original article.

    • GallusMag Says:

      Weird. I’ll look into it- thank you for telling me.

      As for the Misogyny Project- that’s just the way reddit is set up. The “posts” are usually only one line or two, commentary on something misogynist that the poster has spotted. If you click on the line it takes you to the text being commented on. It’s not a blog per se.

      ADD: Hon I took you off and put you back on again to see if that fixes it. Looks like it worked but please let me know if you see a problem again. Thanks again.

  35. Thanks Gallus, seems to be there now.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: