Baby’s First Dildo -courtesy of the Transgender Movement

September 26, 2015

tranz dildo for ugh Occasionally the subject of a post leaves me speechless. This is one of those posts. Dildos for 4 year old girls, marketed by a “genderqueer” woman in San Francisco named Den Kirkwood Tucker. den kirkwood tucker It would appear this project has some affiliation with Gender Spectrum, the organization involved in public school programming to elementary school children. See for yourself below. Read the article that brought this campaign to my attention here: http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/parenting/more-than-just-undies-the-smallest-details-are-the-most-important-for-parents-of-transgender-kids/story-fnet08ui-1227539339418 tranzwear dildo 1 transwear dildo 2 transwear dildo 3 transwear dildo 4 ..

http://www.tranzwear.net/store.php/TranZwear/ct159601/for_parents_of_ftm_childrenteens

dildo for 4 ugh

tranzwear ugh 1

360 Responses to “Baby’s First Dildo -courtesy of the Transgender Movement”

  1. stchauvinism Says:

    “TeenyBopper packer” wow. I used to be one of those women who was all “well, I dont understand being trans, but I want to respect people’s identities cause reasons and blah,blah,blah, etc” Nope, fuck it, I do not have any respect for this female hating, lesbian hating, fucked up heteronormativity literally on steroids bullshit that would give Mengele pause that is the public face of “progressive” and “feminism” and “lgbt” and dear goddess what the fuck is going on.

    • tnmusicman Says:

      Indeed!! Why do we need something like this?? The idea that this is for kiddies is bad enough but what about the adults buying it FOR their kids??

      • stchauvinism Says:

        The kind of parent who would transition their non girly daughter is the kind of parent who would rather medically experiment on their child and buy them prosthetic penises rather than deal with having a non feminine daughter who might grow up to be a lesbian. This is how liberal progressives do homophobia these days, they call themselves lgbt allies and buy their baby dyke daughters prosthetic penises and corsets to flatten their chess and compress their rib cages, cut off their daughters breasts and shorten their daughter lives by injecting them with testosterone. Conservative christians are also transitioning their kids,they just are open about saying things like they are ok with transgenders but think homophobia is a sin, for examples of this, see Pat Robertson

      • gamma Says:

        And it’s marketed towards the “7-12” age group. I don’t think a child that age needs a silicone penis that will “pop up”. How’s a weird child sized sex toy supposed to help them? The other “prosthetics” would help the child pee like other boys I guess but wouldn’t the fact that it’s obviously fake looking prevent it from begin used in public? And why do 7 year olds need a visible bulge? No. No no no. It doesn’t look like anyone with a medical background and experience dealing with transsexual children was involved either.

        I don’t want to jump to conclusions and call the person selling this stuff a pedophile, ’cause there would need to be more solid proof though. There’s much more contentious stuff than this out there.

        Major newspapers like the telegraph publish stuff like this:

        “ A Dutch study published in 1987 found that a sample of boys in paedophilic relationships felt positively about them. And a major if still controversial 1998-2000 meta-study suggests – as J Michael Bailey of Northwestern University, Chicago, says – that such relationships, entered into voluntarily, are “nearly uncorrelated with undesirable outcomes”.

        source: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100196502/guardian-paedophiles-are-ordinary-members-of-society-who-need-moral-support/ (now no longer online and archive.org is saying there’s a robot.txt on the page) (It was online less than a year ago, too. Had been online for years, iirc. Hmmm, suspicious.)

        then those thinking there’s a market for what is essentially a miniaturized sex toy will probably employ some unsound argument citing “children’s sexuality” as a reason for a child to have a replica penis that can get erect.

  2. dsgr554 Says:

    This is pedo grooming.

    bulletbriefs dot com??

    They don’t even try to hide pederasty anymore.

    • David hector Says:

      Completely agree , the sick bastards

    • Jummy Says:

      It’s not a slippery slope. It’s an agenda. The line will be crossed thusly: If a five year-old is competent to choose their gender, who’s to say that he or she is not competent to choose with whom they enjoy intimate contact?


      • Jummy, I really, really wish you were wrong about that. But I think you’re correct, and the chills won’t stop shooting down my spine.

      • Margot Channing's Chocolate Says:

        I never even THOUGHT about that implication. Truly disturbing.

        I was a very “live and let live” kind of gay man, I mean, a black gay man has little business judging others, but the fact that I absolutely would have been forced to use blockers and be called a girl by my Evangelical Catholic parents.

  3. Oceans Says:

    This, I think, will achieve Peak Trans if it hits the mainstream media. This is wrong on so many levels and seriously crosses a lot of lines. It’s one of the most disturbing thing I have ever seen.

    • GallusMag Says:

      Seriously ready to puke.

      • Bev Jo Says:

        Exactly my response. Beyond disgusting. The poor targeted girls.

        Can anything be more clear that the trans cult wants to erase girls and women, and is patriarchy at its extreme female-hating.

    • tnt666 Says:

      I agree, if this fails to cause peak trans* in believers, I don’t know what the fuck will!

    • gunnhild Says:

      Yes. Why would someone sit and think about this and even create models of children’s genitals for kids to wear. That “pops up”, as in, simulates a sexual reaction. Holy shit. No one (except child abusers) would think this was ok if it wasn’t for the trans lingo.

      • Not an asshole Says:

        I fail to see how it “popping up” is interpreted as a simulation of sexual arousal instead of as a functional feature to prevent the user from peeing on themself.

      • GallusMag Says:

        “Packers” have nothing to do with urination. They have no function beyond aesthetics.

      • Not an asshole Says:

        I mean, a STP is a type of packer, but I see what you meant. The one gunnhild was referring to is not an STP. I got the designs mixed up. However, in the description it says that the “popping up” is due to a problem with the size (and presumably weight of material), not a design feature. I feel like you guys are trying to sexualize children’s genitals by super-imposing an adult sexual frame of reference. Children DO think about their genitals, but not in the loaded way that adults do. I remember staring at my vulva in the full-length bathroom mirror with awe and pride when I was three years old.

      • GallusMag Says:

        They are fucking dildos. For four year olds. That you are defending. What the fuck is wrong with you?

      • cerulean blue Says:

        “Not an asshole,” someone actually designed that packer with the pop up penis. That means it went through multiple rounds of prototype development before it was sent off for casting. You know, sculpting where an artist looked at reference photos or live models, feedback from target buyers, that sort of thing.

        Its creator easily could have made it a one piece unit with penis attached to scrotum, such that it wouldn’t appear to be erect. Its creator chose NOT to, just as he chose to make it resemble the mature, sexually functional anatomy of a male adult, not a child. Ask yourself why that is. Also, your name doesn’t fit, because someone who thinks a four year old girl walk should walk around with a model of an adult’s erect penis in her pants really is an asshole, or much worse.

      • Not an asshole Says:

        It’s clearly not modeled after an erect penis, but a flaccid penis. This looks like a pretty low-budget operation; I doubt that there were that many prototypes. If the prototypes used a different material than in production, the problem wouldn’t have been anticipated. I just think you guys are reading a lot into this.
        It’s been said before, but packers are not dildos (yes , some dildos have “pack and play” functions, but just because you can pack with a dildo doesn’t make it a packer), the difference being that one is for sex, the other is not.
        I don’t think kids /should/ be walking around with packers, but if a little boy feels uncomfortable or incomplete walking around without a penis, what is wrong with him having an alternative?

      • GallusMag Says:

        These are for little girls. Four year old girls.
        You are a very sick person.

      • Not an asshole Says:

        I’m not the one sexualizing children, y’all.
        I really don’t get you guys. Why do you think vicious hatred and oppression of marginalized people is cool? Why do you think parents should force gendered identities on children who are at odds with them? Why can’t you just let people live? What happened to you? Why do you care so much?

      • GallusMag Says:

        “Why are you forcing babies to commit suicide?” LOL.
        We’re not doing ANY of those things, creepo. I’m letting this comment through so people can see how the trans lobby tries to spin things, up to and including baby dildos.

      • Bea Says:

        “Why do you think parents should force gendered identities on children who are at odds with them?”

        Uhh…we don’t? That’s why we don’t think little girls who hate “feminine” stuff need to pretend they’re male.

        “Girl” isn’t a “gendered identity,” it’s the word for a female child.

        You all are the ones who are terrorizing children with gender. Little girls don’t need to pretend they have a dick…for any reason. There’s no excuse for that kind of misogyny and anatomy-shaming.


      • Usually the deranged prudes/breeders on here claim a word by its function rather than form [when it serves them] but instead they do the reverse and call a fake penis by its form rather than function, when a dildo is defined by the latter; of course all of the original sources and resources disprove them.

        They loathe kids so much that they deny their sexual determination and awareness; they are the only sick perverts here. They talk the same way as racists, sexists, and nationalists on nonmoderated and right-wing moderated boards. They can’t bring up scientific or statistic arguments to their irrational fantasies; it’s a matter of personal belief and revulsion. If society were allowed what they deny, it exposes them as the prevaricant equivocant selfish histrionic sociopathic trash they are.

      • charlson Says:

        This is not normal. Who could get a 4 yo to go along with wearing that thing. Who decided on the size, that is not normal. Whats next, a vagina strap on for little boys? Who is body shaming little girls in the first place? I know how this company works because I read their ahem, list of products and there is serious boundary crossing going on .
        Finally , I am going to just say it straight out. I see little girls being abused with this and I can imagine some nasty pieces of scum rubbing their hands with glee already.

      • charlson Says:

        Not an asshole Says:

        September 30, 2015 at 12:03 am
        ….(”Why can’t you just let people live? What happened to you? Why do you care so much?”)

        Not an asshole-
        Why don’t you care would be a better question. Think it through.

        The problems associated with using this alone should give you pause . Tiny children, painful infections that girls could get and may never recover from, the invasive aspects, babysitting and the fact that this is an adult projection on to a child who does not have any idea what is being done to her or what is being taken away as well, to name just a few outrageous objections.
        I have 3 girls and 1 boy and none thought about their gender at that age. I call bullshit on the whole idea.
        Normal people have a gut instinct which is why we need to protect our children from sickos who are using our kids up then throwing them away.

    • endthewoo Says:

      More likely the build up of a massive backlash where decent LGB (especially L) will suffer yet more by association with the perv Ts.

      The mainstream media take on this is no way going to be “oh look the radfems were right all along”. Instead we’re going to see a whole pile of nastiness about the gay agenda/PC gone wild/and heaps of homophobia and anti-feminist misogyny.

      Look at that article that Breitbart did, after the Zoey Tur dick-waving episode: swastika imposed on the rainbow flag. This is what we’re in for.

      • stchauvinism Says:

        yep. my thoughts exactly. we see peak trans looking at this, general public looks at this and goes, “this is what gays and lesbians are doing to our kids, this is teh gay agenda” fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck.

      • Oceans Says:

        It’ll be the right-wing media that runs with this. They don’t give two shits about being called transphobic and won’t be shamed into silence (as opposed to liberal media). Once everyday parents learn about this, they will lose their shit.

        Remember the fights all over the country about how far strip bars had to be from schools? This will make that look like a civil discussion.

      • Vanessa Says:

        I LOVE that “normal” feminists are worried they are going to lose any semblance of power.

      • Jummy Says:

        Perhaps you’ve just shown that feminists have a responsibility in this regard.

      • Australopithecene Says:

        Jummy, you don’t know anything about the recent history of feminism. There’s a massive schism over the last ten years or so about exactly this. Feminists who reject the transgender account have been libelled; attacked in print, online and in person; had their children threatened; had their livelihoods threatened; been prevented from speaking in public; been widely misrepresented without having the recourse of defending themselves. By males who think they’re women, and women who think they’re feminists.

        In mainstream “feminist” media like Jezebel and Everyday Feminism, and “feminist” columnists like Jessica Valenti and Clementine Ford, women are being continually told not to listen to us, that we’re violent, evil bigots. Why? Because we say men can’t be women, and that the consequences of doing that will be damaging. And we’re being proven right over and over and over again.

        Listen to the feminists who reject trans ideology, there are a lot of us. Don’t put this mess on us.

  4. australopithecene Says:

    I thought being a boy/girl had nothing to do with genitals? Can’t they make up their fucking minds

  5. Bea Says:

    I am fucking aghast at this. When I was five, I didn’t have brothers so I barely even knew what was in boys’ pants. Why would you encourage a child to feel like their anatomy is wrong?

    I hate this movement. HATE.

    Thank you, Gallus, for the work you do in bringing this anti-human ideology to light.

    • Bea Says:

      “give a natural bulge in his pants”

      when do you see a bulge in a child’s pants?? JFC this is just blatant pedophilia.

      • GallusMag Says:

        Four year old girls! Holy shit!

      • kesher Says:

        In another post I saw about this a “concerned mother” was worried about strangers noticing her young “son’s” lack of a bulge. I’d consider this to be a major case of who smelt it, dealt it. If someone looks closely enough to be able to tell that a fully clothed “boy” is actually a girl, then questions need to be asked about why that person was staring so intently at a child’s crotch.

      • sellmaeth Says:

        If it is just about the bulge, why don’t they just put an extra pair of socks there?

        I fully support the production of fake penises for women who want to crossdress to enter the military or have a career, or become pope, or whatever.

        But the only use a toddler has for a fake penis is that maybe she can convince the boys to play with her if she can pee standing up. Since sexist male toddlers are really not worth anyone’s time … not an useful product.

      • dejavublonde Says:

        I am a single mom- I have an adult son. I raised him in a very open, talk to me about anything, body positive way. I can say, I have literally never even once noticed or even considered the state my son’s ‘package’. I was squicked out even typing that. the only time he ever had anything going on that would draw attention was the occasional full of piss diaper. it simply isn’t something that there is any awareness of in a normal person.

        Every time I think, this is it, this is the most insane, disgusting thing I have ever heard of- I’m wrong. they manage to top themselves. I guess it needs to be said outright – can they please leave children’s genitals out of everything? I can’t even imagine how they think this is okay

  6. redress Says:

    I’m speechless. The descriptions…are so pedo. Thinking about a parent reading them and choosing one for their child makes me physically sick. Imagine a kid going through this childhood and having to recover from this level of interference. Holy. Shit.

  7. tnt666 Says:

    Cuz we all know, no girl is complete without a penis.
    …For the Bible tells me so…

  8. tnt666 Says:

    Reblogged this on tnt666 and commented:
    I wish I had time to blog, but reading others is just so much more engrossing. This may be one of the grossest capitalistic commodoties yet.

    CUZ NO GIRL IS COMPLETE WITHOUT A PENIS… “so the Bible tells me so”.

  9. dbrvnk Says:

    Well, this is… disturbing.

    I’m surprised no transactivists are crying ‘transmisogyny’ over the company’s failure to provide vagina-shaped penis holders for 4-year-old boys. Unless they recognise that it’s actually child sex abuse and simply don’t care when it happens to girls, but they don’t usually seem that self-aware (and in fact like to argue that not providing children with things like this is the abuse).

    • prozac Says:

      Oh, no shame for the shenis. The shame is for the vulva, vagina and sitting to pee, of course. So much that it must be completely sealed in silicone! I have to wonder how healthy it would be even for a child to have their genitals covered with airtight silicone and urine all day, for years on end. (But YOU can wash it with liquid soap and water, mom!) Not to mention, how do they make the pee go up? I’m guessing it sits quite low, like a funnel. Best to not be wearing shorts, guys, it’s hanging lower than the legs of the mannequin. And don’t these kind of look like sexually mature genitalia but smaller? I can’t remember the last time I saw a naked boy who wasn’t in diapers, so I actually have no idea. Ughhhh… The expression on my face as I’m typing this is HORRIFIED. SO WRONG!! Do trans female children even get penis dysphoria? Teens, maybe, but little girls?

      They can make shit like this but they can’t make brain bleach to forget we ever saw it, now THAT’S unfair.

      • ex home birther Says:

        Anyone who has a son knows that these are miniatures of adult genitalia. Male puberty causes a “bulge” by enlarging of the genitals, so a little kid wearing this is going to look very strange.

      • Adrian Says:

        My husband (a man, yes, with an actual flesh and blood natural penis) sits to pee when inside on toilets, and according to him (and what I hear from others) it’s not so unusual of a thing. Never been in the boys’ room at school so not sure if there’s super pressure to always stand or what.

        Looking at the pics, the thing hanging out of the undies doesn’t look like it’s coming out of the normal Y-front of the undies like regular people at all.

        It’s interesting to see this “harness” too. I can imagine a regular camping style “stand to pee” device (not made to look like a penis at all, just a funnel) being handy I suppose when it’s really cold outside and the usual dropping trow to squat isn’t fun, but I can’t imagine wearing that in your pants all day?? Regular camping ones you stuff it in your pants fly to do the deed and then remove it. But these F2T can’t do that in the bathroom without “outing themselves” obviously so they gotta wear it all day long? I can’t even imagine. Just ew.

      • cerulean blue Says:

        Adrian the underwear they sell on their site, “bullet briefs” are standard underwear that have been modified with a hole at the crotch. What you inferred from the photo is correct.

      • MaryMacha Says:

        I was wondering about that too. There’s also no way these things aren’t going to leak. Don’t even want to think of the effect of having this thing attached to a girl’s crotch for hours on end. It can’t be sanitary. Doesn’t anyone regulate this industry?


      • My late stepfather, a gigantic Harley-riding, ZZ Top-looking, cigar-chomping, deer hunting sort of human male, also sat to pee on the toilet seat. Like your husband, Adrian, he never implied there was anything that unusual about it, and it would be hilarious to imagine anyone thinking he was somehow “less of a man” for it. Who exactly is imposing what on who here?

    • sellmaeth Says:

      You mean, vulva-shaped penis holders? Slightly more doable, but I don’t think it’s possible.
      @prozac: Oh, I am sure they get penis dysphoria as soon as they bathe with boys and their “lack” of “equipment” gets noticed and mocked. Before that … I don’t think so.

  10. saltnpepa10 Says:

    Thank you for bringing this to our attention Gallus ! this is all so sick…why are they not arrested for pedophilia is just unbelievable

  11. oopster74 Says:

    Reblogged this on oopster74 and commented:
    Jesus Christ! Do some research on your topic Gallus! This isn’t a dildo, it’s what’s called a packer or packy / packie (I don’t know the exact spelling). This is not paedophillia either you idiot. This is about supply and demand. If there’s demand then there’s supply, and if there isn’t, this won’t last.

    For fucks sake Gallus Mag, at least do your research before criticising something, you just look like an idiot otherwise.

    • GallusMag Says:

      You are a sick man, Sarah Davis.

      • australopithecene Says:

        Like, if you call something different words, and talk about market demand, something bad becomes something good. That’s how ethics works.

        I’m actually interested to see the trans spin on this. They haven’t a hope in hell of convincing people of the wholesomeness of the thing. If they double down they’re going to alienate a lot of people who hardly knew they existed last week.

      • ephemeroptera Says:

        To be honest, the post’s dildo headline and packer quotes confused me too, at first.

        But dildo is accurate, since it’s like a groomer for a strap-on?

        It’s something much odder than a funnel, since it’s worn all day despite the obvious hygiene problems.

      • michelle Says:

        to australopithecene:

        You just saw the tranny spin…oopster is a male who claims tranny status.

        In other words, the tranny brigade is fully onboard with the marketing of pedophilic sexualization of children…

      • GallusMag Says:

        This is “Sarah”

        I encourage any mainstream reporters following up on this story to contact Oopster/ Sarah Brown for the transgender POV.

    • Smits Says:

      Because as we all know there are absolutely zero packers on sale that can double as dildos, none out there whatsoever that can be made to lie flat or stick out in a way that is not at all reminiscent of one of these totally awesome and wholesome devices for little girls suffering from the terrible affliction of not being ‘girly’ enough.

      And of course packers are always used for practical man-costuming purposes and no-one ever has bought and worn one for their own creepy sexual sensibilities. There’s no crossover at all between packers and dildos, that’s why you definitely won’t find packers for sale at sex toy shops.

      100% guaranteed true facts, brought to you by some dude who knows that women are of course stupid and couldn’t possibly know these things.

    • prozac Says:

      Oopster, you are an asshole. From the momma bear blog’s comments:

      oopster74 on September 27, 2015 at 3:54 pm
      Gallus Mag is a shameless teller of anti-trans propaganda and lies, and can’t even leave a 4 year old child out of her petty muckspreading. You should be ashamed of your behaviour Gallus Mag!

      • GallusMag Says:

        What a compelling argument he makes…

      • charlson Says:

        Oopster.74 said –
        ”and can’t even leave a 4 year old child out of her petty muckspreading. You should be ashamed of your behaviour Gallus Mag!”

        Hey Oopster, Gallus didn’t design this torture device, not did she project her snowflake all inclusiveness onto kids that don’t realize what is being done to them by insecure adults and will have no say in the matter .
        Think on who did this and why. Its so obvious what is happening here, if, you aren’t a fantasist. It’s not always about special Trans feelings you know
        Then go boil your head!

    • Bea Says:

      Sarah Davis — there is plenty of demand for pedo stuff, sure. Basically you’re saying that the demand for child porn is okay because people will buy it?

    • Charlotte Says:

      If you think this shit is okay to give to small children, that says a fuck of a lot BAD about you, “Sarah”.

      I shudder to think what other sexual items you think would be okay to give to children.

      And thanks for attaching his pic, Gallus, so we moms know if this pervie wanker goes into the bathroom with our daughter’s to call in for back up.

    • Mortadella Says:

      Supply and demand…which also means prostitution is a necessity.

    • charlson Says:

      An adult looking penis. Little boys do not look like this.I wonder if this is designed by someone with a ….wee.. esteem/fantasy problem?

  12. endthewoo Says:

    Any decent LGB organisation (if there any left) needs to buckle up and take an explicit stand against this. It should be made clear that adults who just want to be left alone to have consenting relationships with other adults has NOTHING to do with this circus of delusional narcissists, pervs and child abusers. The T does not belong anywhere near us, and pomo queer inc is not remotely the same as “not hetero”.

  13. LilithLovesWomyn Says:

    Good goddess, the additional mind-fuck trauma these girls are going to have to unwind.

    • Bea Says:

      Not to mention silicone absorbs smells, so they are probably going to be outcasts partially for that reason. As a girl, we all went pee together and it was no big deal. The boys did, too. It was based off our bodies, not our hobbies.

      I had a ton of friends as a kid…boys, girls, white, black, native, etc. Not once did any kid ever express that they “felt like the opposite sex.” Not once…and this was in the 90s, so not so long ago. I heard a lot of weird shit, too: kids telling me their parents were drug dealers, their siblings were teen moms, kids telling me about their sexual abuse, kids experimenting with each other, they told me about incest…but never once did a kid sincerely express the desire to be the opposite sex.

      • MaryMacha Says:

        Bea, I think those were saner times. Hard to believe I know. The idea had to take root in order for it to take root. No one would have thought of anything that crazy as a possible explanation for what is a normal discomfort with some aspect or other of the status-quo gender-roles.

      • Enna Says:

        Before:
        A girl says “mom! I’m a prince!”
        the mom would answer: “oh no honey, you’re a girl, you’re a princess”
        Girl: “So a boy is a prince and a girl a princess?”
        mom: “yes honey”.
        girl: “ok!” *runs to play*

        Now:
        A girl says “mom! I’m a prince!”
        Mom posts on tumblr: “I fully support my trans-child we are looking for puberty blockers options, he is a prince”.

  14. prozac Says:

    I just realised hir/ze/xir last name is Tucker. Den Tucker. I hope it’s not a den of iniquities! I wonder if that’s a new name or perhaps just the hand of Fate. I’m also curious about the nature of the previous enterprise “project open hand”. Especially when is adjacent to a picture of an open hand with a child size dildo in it. Ugh.

    • GallusMag Says:

      This individual’s alternate names are tagged in the post. At least three of them are. Her business is registered to an “M. Tucker” which I suspect is a fourth alias.

      • prozac Says:

        I’m wondering if it eludes to tucking one’s penis, which would be a male experience… Perhaps a wish to need to tuck, or possibly even a packer Tucker. Can’t get more genderqueer than that!

        Also, boisland sounds like a gay nightclub.

    • MaryMacha Says:

      Project Open Hand is a well established nonprofit that came out of the AIDS crisis in the gay men’s community. They prepared meals for the terminally ill. I think they still do but am not sure and don’t know much about them.

      • prozac Says:

        Thanks for the input, I hadn’t gotten around to googling it.. This post is so distracting! That seems like an honorable thing to do!

    • Sanders Seward Says:

      It’s “her”. Stop making up words.

  15. gunnhild Says:

    As suspected, this is pedo sex toy stuff. It says on their site that their dildos “for parents of FTM children”
    (http://www.tranzwear.net/store.php/TranZwear/pd7699840/masho_stp_) are made by Tomax from Japan. Japan has a strong culture of sexualizing children, so it’s no surprise that Googling them, I found out that they’re a sex toy company and make child vagina toys that men can wank into.

    WARNING gross pedophile sextoy link as proof, Gallus Mag please feel free to remove it: wwwDOTqueencatadulttoysDOTcom/pillow-hole-sakuras-camel-toe/
    God I need to go rinse my eyes now…I hate men.

    • FeistyAmazon Says:

      This is so sick I dont EVEN know what to say. And I’m not generally the anti porn bandwagon type. HOWEVER when it comes to kids, this REALLY borders on pedophilia…teach these girls THEY CAN BE AND DO ANYTHING THEY WANT IN A FEMALE BODY!!!Accept them where theyre at..how they want to dress what sports and activities they want to pursue. These are our potential brethren, Our lineage for those of us who are BUTCH. I hated myself as a young girl..but that was because girlhood limited me…but I also hated penises I thought they were horrible and ugly still do.

      The ANSWER isnt making girls wear fake penises they will never be able to pee through or so they can survive a boys locker room or bathroom. The ANSWER is eliminating gender proscriptions boxes rules and limitations altogether!

      First there was the dildo loving dyke crowd in SF..and thats fine as an instrument for lovemaking..but then ceryain Butches showed me their very realistic soft packers so they could pack all the time..and I suppose that need was one step towards transitioning. Then those who transitioned to FTM wore said soft packers to appear male in more circumstances, with no plans of the devastating bottom genital surgery.

      And they were of legal age. But to convince young girls they are boys and create packers that look and almost feel like real penises is not only pornographic but pedophilic, and another way to make a buck on the deep distress females of ALL ages have with their bodies..and much of it due to the one down role ALL females are forced to take on once they pop out of the womb…

      The sentiment against us Lesbians and all homosexuals will turn very rapidly because of the craziness of the trans movement.

    • Kidney Bean Says:

      I want to throw up now ;-;

    • Bea Says:

      Not to mention the connotations of wearing a dildo harness all the time. Can you imagine? Definitely grooming kids for SM.

      If you go watch the video it linked to about a little girl they re-named “Jacob,” they talk about “his” rock collection and collection of dead bugs, but insist it has nothing to do with his preferences…then they say “he” gave away all of “his” old girl toys to his sister. So glad I didn’t grow up in this tyrranical era…I could have a rock and dead bug collection and all that meant was I was a kid.

      • ephemeroptera Says:

        Okay, associating bug collections with boys is INSANE.

        My downstairs neighbor’s 1 niece and 2 nephews showed me the niece’s bug collection when I was taking out the trash to the alley through the backyard this summer.

        You know what I said to the niece? “Oh cool, maybe you’ll be a biologist when you grow up.”

        Not, “You’re a boy!”

        Funny enough, her brothers kinda hated the bugs.

        Let all hobbies be for all kids!

    • Bea Says:

      From the same site:
      http://wwwDOTqueencatadulttoysDOTcom/tubomi-masturbator/

      I’m gonna need to wash my soul now…

    • Zaucy Says:

      I heard about this the other day, and I was disgusted. I went to that site you gave and looked around to see what other perversions were there.

      I couldn’t believe it, they have a body style toy with small budding breasts. These are from 2 comments by purchasers (model and maker Xed out):

      “Everything you’ve heard and read before is true. This particular Xxxxxxx by Xxxxx Xxxx is built to satisfy a particular fetish and the execution is mind-blowing!!!”

      “The weight of this masturbator is about 7 pounds which is about 1 foot in length. It is literally the size of a infant torso.”

      A particular fetish, the size of an infant torso. Like another poster said, every time I think it can’t get worse it does.

    • Siobhan Says:

      So for all those protesting that this is just an innocent little “packer” to increase the self-esteem of sad little girls who somehow were born without a penis, here is part of the description of one of the dildos pictured above, from that site:

      “…It’s a super fun toy to play with at any parties. Or you can simply keep it on your desk and touch its shaft and balls all you want, whenever you want. It is soft, cute, and feels very good to the touch.”

      So tell us again that it isn’t a sex toy…

  16. cerulean blue Says:

    Wow. I’m often disgusted by the trans movem


  17. But…if boys can be born with vaginas, why would this trans boy feel less of a boy without a penis? The Ts have been insisting for years now that sex organs so not define gender. If Laverne Cox can have a “feminine penis,” then why can’t transfemales have masculine vaginas?

  18. cerulean blue Says:

    Sorry, my reply sent by accident.

    I’m often disgusted by the constant boundary violation of the trans borg, but this is spine chilling.

    This is pedogrooming, and as others in the thread have stated, we can only hope that the backlash will be directed at trans only, and not the other lgb members of the group they’ve colonized and violated.

    As a mother of a boy, I often wondered exactly what my son’s pediatrician was doing at his annual physical, although I never watched, as I wanted to respect his privacy. And since from a young age my son has valued his privacy, I had no real idea of how big a boys penis usually is. So I looked it up.

    Here is a diagram showing Tanner stages– the tool MDS use to gauge when a kid has entered puberty. healthvermont.gov/…/tools%5CJ-1%20CARD%20Tanner%20Stages.pdf
    Note how tiny the penis and scrotum are in pre adolescent males. In the US, boys enter tanner stage 2 at an average age of 9 to 10. This chart shows average penis length by age: http://www.drgreene.com/qa-articles/penis-size/

    Now look at the diagrams in the article. The measurements given are intentionally inaccurate, because penis size in kids and adults is measures from the base of the pubic bone. The dildo seller is measuring the shaft only, so the numbers are smaller. If you look at the first dildo in the person’s hand you can see that it extends from the base of the thumb almost to the end of the index finger. Assuming the person’s hand is average and female, that’s over four inches. So let’s do the math: the dildo recommended for 5 to 8 year olds is 66 percent larger than the STRETCHED penis length for an 8 year old, 60 percent larger than the average stretched size of an 11 year old, and 80 percent of the average size of an adult penis. Even the teeny bopper, which appears to be 3.5 inches, not 2.5 as stated, is 60% larger than what you’d see on an actual 4 year old boy.

    So even though, in the world of trans, genitals supposedly don’t matter, little girls are being told their vaginas must be hidden by a device made to resemble the genitals of someone much older, someone who is mature enough for sexual activity. Tell me the trans movement is not about adults grooming kids to not only bear the brunt of a movement centered on sexual deviancy, but to be the subjects of others deviancy.

    • gchild Says:

      @cerulean blue

      “…someone who is mature enough for sexual activity”

      Do the parents know what the phrase “so and so is packing” means? It is in reference to the size of a mans penis, not a boy, but a man. It means he has a large one. I have always know it to be sexual. And they, (the sex toy makers) fucking know it too.

      Dildo-looking “packers” for kids? So 4 yr old female children can look like they are “packing”? Really? In real life, this is the solution to the problem of gender dysphoria?

      It makes me sick. I don’t care what the mothers say, if you have to hook up with sex toy manufacturers to help a child, your not helping! It literally makes me fucking sick…and breaks my goddamned heart. How can they do this to children?

  19. cerulean blue Says:

    I notice that form and function llc, which makes one of the “kid sized” dildos on this page, is NOT selling it on etsy, their sales platform . Gee, I wonder why?

  20. Livvie Says:

    There is not a four year old girl in the world who even remotely entertains the notion that they need to wear a fake cock. How the fuck can we stop this? I feel like I’m going insane. This is not normal. This is so wrong on so many levels.

    Look at this asshole with his big grin, promising to help your ‘gender confused’ child. When I was four I didn’t even know what dicks were. Why are we sexualizing toddlers? Why does it need to ‘pop up’ when not packed? Why are trannies so obsessed with little kids?

    I’m seriously ill. Again. I keep thinking peak trans is reached and it’s not.

    • shediogenes Says:

      I think it “pops up” when there isn’t weight against it because of the nature of the material used and the casting process. The manufacturer is using dildo silicone. It’s gonna pop up because it’s shorter length means the amount of material at the end doesn’t have enough weight to make it lay down on its own. One solution to this is to basically just cast a one part “lump” that would give the appearance of male genitals under a pair of pants. Granted, it would look like a 4 year old with adult male genitals under her pants, but I am more curious why it absolutely HAD to look like separate penis and testes. Whatever I come up with it all leads back to grooming. No 4 yo girl should have a penis in her pants, prosthetic or otherwise. This shit is triggering as fuck. I’m sitting here trying to come up with any scenario in which tucking a dildo down the pants of a 4 yo girl could in any way not turn out badly. I got nuthin. Companies are making a profit off this shit and because Tranz. Inc. says so I’m supposed to see this as something progressive? What the ever loving fuck?

  21. Ashland Avenue Says:

    I think I’ve posted this before, and apologies if I have, but…

  22. Susan Nunes Says:

    This is sexual abuse. This and the recent Salon piece are just beyond disgusting and into the criminal. I hope somebody is contacting the authorities for both.

  23. Siobhan Says:

    Aside from the creepy sexualization of babies aspect, this is just horribly sad. So there are parents who think that their little girls who reject feminine stereotypes should put pretend dicks in their pants so that no one knows they are really female.

    I see this trend to hide a child’s femaleness as similar to race-shaming. I have a Mexican-American friend whose father is somewhat dark-skinned. Growing up, her maternal grandma (who thought of herself as being more “pure” Spanish) constantly forced her to wear light-colored tights, long sleeves, and makeup to hide the “shame” of her dark skin. My friend says that this led to a lifetime of self-hate and confusion regarding herself, her body, and her heritage, even more than most females. She is in middle age and still sadly struggles with those feelings. It is very hard to undo that kind of damage.

  24. Ben X Says:

    It’s almost as if vulvas were characteristic of girls and penises were characteristic of boys.

  25. hearthrising Says:

    Well if you weren’t already through with transgenderism, this would be it. The product does nicely fit the genderfluid trans-aged, though. You can pick a penis sized to how old you feel that day. I’m guessing that very few parents will feel drawn to this. The concept has an intrinsic appeal to pedophiles, who like to fantasize about being children.

  26. Yuck Says:

    Burn it with fire


  27. This is disgusting. Just when you think it couldn’t get more creepy, this comes along.

  28. stopthemadness Says:

    Hmm…

    About a week or so ago, Slate or Salon – can’t tell them apart – ran a “sympathetic” article from a pedo, and they also happen to be one of tranny cheerleaders on the net (you may remember the time they posted a dead serious op-ed proclaiming that announcing the gender of a baby at birth is twanzphobic).

    We’ve also seen and heard a number of stories coming out about predatory MtTs taking advantage of minors, especially ones hanging around in toxic “queer” circles.

    MtTs are also disproportionately involved in every manner of “kink”, most of which is disgusting and misogynistic but protected under the guise of “sex positivity” and other libfem “queer” mumbojumbo.

    Coincidence? I think not. Perverts and deviants are riding this new wave of transgenderism not only to infiltrate and destroy female spaces but also to gradually break down the taboo around pedophilia. And most people are either too blind or scared to call them out on it because they’re obsessed with keeping their “tolerant progressive” credit or don’t want to be harassed as a bigot and “terf”. This is thanks in large part to formerly gay and lesbian groups being taken over and catering to the transgender agenda.

    Groups like GLAAD and HRC as well as state and local “lgbt” organizations only listen to money and IMO the only thing that will make them wake up and start distancing themselves from the tranny movement is when the money stops coming in from donors who make their complaints known. That so-called lesbian org was forced to recall their boycott on Michfest when their members let them know they weren’t having it. I think it’s time the major gay and lesbian groups remember who they’re supposed to be working for and who actually pays their damn bills.

    • Susan Nunes Says:

      It was Salon, which had no business publishing the article, and the perv author is named Todd Nickerson. He was also on Dr Drew, the biggest apologist for degenerates on television.

      I was serious when I kept saying that the authorities needed to be called on the article, and the IP addresses of the sympathetic comments needed to be investigated. NO quarter should ever be given to pedophiles.

    • KgSch Says:

      I refuse to ever donate any money to those organizations. I encourage anyone donating money to those organizations who has a conscience to stop immediately. Personally I’m not interested in joining “LG” or “LGB” organizations. Lesbian-only groups all the way.🙂

      I remember that stating what sex a baby is at birth is somehow transphobic. What utter nonsense. And yes, I have been noticing all this pedophile-sympathy bullshit. It’s disgusting. One “queer” group I went to when I was 19 tried to pull that. It was disgusting how he and his female cheerleader and the rest of the group tried to gaslight everyone into sympathizing with him. My friend and I just left.

    • ephemeroptera Says:

      “MtTs are also disproportionately involved in every manner of ‘kink’, most of which is disgusting and misogynistic but protected under the guise of ‘sex positivity’ and other libfem ‘queer’ mumbojumbo.”

      This dynamic is very interesting, in my opinion.

      Anthropologist Staci Newmahr gets at what seems to be the root cause in her pansexual BDSM dungeon ethnography “Playing on the Edge” (a very perceptive study very much worth reading, whatever a person’s stance for or against BDSM).

      What she observed in the group that was the focus of her observations, were socially marginal, very self-consciously open-minded people who took up random activities floating around among other socially marginal people and who even sometimes perceived these activities as a badge of superiority (a correlate of the pedantic, verbose self-certainty called “mansplaining”, though I’ve been mansplained to by female kinksters).

      This explains the seemingly greater-than-chance overlap between involvement in sci-fi/fantasy, kinky sex, Ren Faires and the SCA, neopaganism, etc.

      My guess is that a similar dynamic explains the overlap between trans*activists, kink, and pushing the boundaries of mainstream morality with these packers for 4 year olds.

      Perhaps also some hipster parents of children-deemed-trans fall into this category (though not the conservative parents uncomfortable with possibly gay children?).

      As the bumper sticker goes, “How much can you open your mind until your brain falls out?”

  29. emmajune Says:

    I thought we’re all supposed to NOT CARE what’s in people’s PANTS.

  30. Bev Jo Says:

    I’ve been watching and fighting the trans cult since 1971 and didn’t think anything else they did would surprise me, but there is always more. This is beyond disgusting on so many levels, like everyone here is saying.

    The girls I grew up with had no idea what pricks looked like. Even those with brothers usually never saw them since working class little boys in those days were expected to be clothed and modest. When we were told in high school what penises were and did, the girls were horrified. Of course most learned to accept it (ignoring their in- love feelings for other girls) to become proper het girls so they could fit in and be considered “normal” in patriarchy.

    The little girls who did not want to be forced into frilly and silly male-identified femininity certainly would not have wanted a pretend prick to wear since they didn’t even know about penises. This would have repulsed them as much as it does us now.

    So then who is this marketed for? It has to be the parents. And what kind of parents would buy such a repulsive and expensive thing for their little girls to wear? Besides the girl molester pervert types, people who are hoping for their own TV series?

  31. Bev Jo Says:

    I keep hoping that women will finally realize what is going on with the trans cult, but most will dutifully accept this too, won’t they?

  32. sam Says:

    What the fuck is wrong with u you nasty queer

  33. drs. Efthimia Dilpizoglou Says:

    Reblogged this on Project Keep Staring and commented:
    Reblogged from the Gendertrender WordPress blog. I am going to the bathroom now to throw up –>

  34. Sensible person Says:

    All of you are taking this extremely out of context. It doesn’t take much to click a single page to see the FAQ, which directly states what these objects are and what they’re meant for. Here, I’ll make it easy for all of you and go ahead and paste what it says.

    “1. What is an STP?

    STP stands for “stand-to-pee.” It is a device which allows a person to urinate in a standing position.”

    If you even bothered to scroll down in the FAQ, you would also notice that they are not intended for sexual play/penetration whatsoever.

    Hell, all it would take is some common sense to notice that these aren’t actually dildos. Dildos aren’t flaccid penises or are purposely hollow. Quit being dumb and falling for shitty click-bait articles that are meant to fool you and get a rise out of you.

    And before people start attacking me, no, I’m not defending transexuals or pedophiles. I personally believe that any person who is identifiable as such has something wrong in their brain, or is specifically raised in a household which enables people to be like that. I don’t give a shit if you think these kinds of people should be thrown in a mental hospital, but you shouldn’t be judging them for the wrong reasons.

    These products are meant for female-to-male trans who are too young to get operations done. It’s as simple as that. If anything, we should be relieved that these products exist instead of them mutilating kids genitalia at a young age.

    • Susan Nunes Says:

      You don’t get it. These products are a form of child abuse. Little kids should NEVER be subject to the trans propaganda and be forced by their dimwitted parents to use these.

    • prozac Says:

      Who is mutilating kids genitalia at a young age? Why would I be relieved that a three or four year old child is being led to believe their body is wrong and shameful?? We understand what they are used for, thank you. Most of us probably also believe that very young girls do not come up with the idea of packing a prosthetic penis which, as pointed out above, is oversized and more sexually mature looking than a boy’s is. A lot of children don’t really think about genitalia much at all, which is as it should be. (Beyond bathroom function, learning body parts and about what is bad touching, that is)

    • dbrvnk Says:

      Even if the kid is severely sex dysphoric from an early age, and not merely the gender-nonconforming type that will say things like “I want to be a boy so I can grow a mustache” or whatever (which is the sort of thing most munchausen-by-proxy parents report their ‘trans kids’ actually saying)… “my child is really transgender” is not a decision parents should be making. Ever. (Nor, for that matter, is “my child is definitely not transgender”. Like… wait and see until the kid’s old enough to decide for themselves.) And parents definitely should not be buying plastic dicks for their children to wear, or planting the idea in their childrens’ minds. That’s completely inappropriate.

    • Mortadella Says:

      Umm, so, these cod pieces for little girls to wear will encourage girls to love their natural bodies? No. I think these stupid products imply there’s something wrong with the way they are born. Females aren’t castrated males . They don’t need surgery, weirdo. They’re fine the way they are — until nutter adults like you fuck them up.

      Seriously…wtf would you buy a fake dildo for an underage girl to wear? What, she said she likes the color blue? She’s good at math? Stop mind-fucking girls. Leave them alone with your gender-queer, hipster mind-fuck shit.

  35. warrior of death Says:

    You guys are fucking sick seriously you got issues you goddammed pedofile motherfuckers leave kids out of your shit they don’t need to be forced to follow any path bit their own

    • liberalsareinsane Says:

      You apparently haven’t noticed that this NOT a trans/pro trans site; in fact, it is quite the opposite. Perhaps reading or reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

      Why don’t you slither over to reddit or any men’s rights site & lecture them about their pro-trans. They love trans.


  36. Sick Mentally derranged pedophiles. Why aren’t people file lawsuits against them? seriously, this country’s spirit has been destroyed.

  37. cerulean blue Says:

    Note that the tranzwear website entry page states the site is not suitable for those under 18, and that anyone entering the site is not to provide access to those under 18. Yet the site is marketing mini adult penises for 4 year olds.

  38. GallusMag Says:

    The 4thWaveNow blog has picked up the story and has a piece that goes into detail about the original article:
    http://4thwavenow.com/2015/09/26/san-francisco-company-selling-packers-for-trans-boys-ages-4-and-up/

  39. Shannon Says:

    you are disgusting Devils.

  40. GallusMag Says:

    Thank you Buck!❤

  41. Margie Says:

    IMO, this is just another manifestation of trans mental illness. They are driven insane because they can’t reconcile their identities with their bodies, so they flounder around trying to reconcile the discrepancy. One coping strategy is to declare genitalia irrelevant to gender, as in “Not all women have vaginas and not all men have penises.”

    When that doesn’t work, a second strategy, more deranged than the first, is to exalt the vagina as a symbol of exemplary manhood:

    “[R]ather than experiencing particular genitals (e.g., a “vagina”) as limiting one’s ability to self identify as a man, internet-mediated transmasculine discourse reveals the way in which genitals may be discursively resignified (e.g., as a “bonus hole”) as not only adequate, but as an aspect of exemplary manhood.” (Making Space for Trans Sexualities by Carla Pfeffer, Journal of Homosexuality April 2014)

    And here we have a third approach, which is to assert not that genitals are irrelevant or that “bonus holes” are a manly trait, but that being a boy necessitates having a penis, and a “trans boy” shouldn’t be without one even at age 4. With unintended irony, the ad assures parents that the artificial latex add-on will make their child “feel more confident in his skin.”

    So the “trans men” lurch from one approach to the other, contradicting themselves over and over again, in a never-ending quest to convince themselves that they are real men. But they aren’t, and they know it.

  42. dsgr554 Says:

    I actually thought of an earlier post you made of a guy incarcerated for child porn when I saw the ‘strapon for a child’:

    https://gendertrender.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/back.jpg?w=480&h=251

    Although, these seem to be about strapons- for four -year olds, the pedo film in his court record mentioned a ten year old girl with a strapon.

    I wondered who made strapons that small, and if they are aware where something like this is likely to end up.

    😦

  43. KB Says:

    This is just beyond. No parent should be this preoccupied with their preschooler’s genitals.

  44. liberalsareinsane Says:

    “Den Kirkwood Tucker” penis envy is showing. What a sick bitch. Hope this is picked up by the mainstream media & she gets torn to shreds.


  45. Yeah…so, I went to their website and… oh shit! They have them with veins! Dafuq! Little boys don’t have veiny penises! (At least the ones whose diapers I’ve changed)

    • dsgr554 Says:

      There are a lot of red flags here:

      I baby-sat all through my teen years and changed diapers too: young males, do not have distended scrotum’s until their mature adult years.

      The strap-ons and dildos [in child-size] they are selling are modeled after mature adult male genitalia.

      The dildo with the suction cup is kind of puzzling, because,- this is sold for adults: that suction cup attaches to the female genitalia and is stimulating, or it can be attached to a flat surface for ‘self- use’. Yes , I took a look- This is an adult sex toy. To wear it, is to use it as a sex toy.

    • marm Says:

      This is a ridiculous, horrible product.

      Why is the penis so girthy ?I haven’t spent much time looking at young boy’s penises (why would I unless I was a urologist or pediatrician?) but that thing in the photo with the hand is as fat as an average MAN’S flaccid penis. Why, why, why ?

    • I'm No Cissie Says:

      Yes. These are absolutely models of adult male genitals. Little boys genitals do NOT look like this.

      This is just sinister, ignorant or both.

  46. Pf Says:

    People, we are talking about developmental stages where the kid is working out the difference between fantasy and reality, here. I can remember spending a great deal of time as a small child being the Incredible Hulk, Godzilla, a T. rex, and a dragon. And I had difficulty for a long time realizing that only one of those beings had ever actually existed.

    The very fact that these are marketed to 4-8 year old children is disturbing in that this shows that adults are actively interfering with the process of sorting out “what I want” from “what is real” and not by simply reminding the kid of inconvenient realities. (I was also at one point convinced that if I could just make some party invitations, my mom would be happy to throw a party for my kindergarten class, just because I wanted some punch and cake. It didn’t end well.) I’m absolutely certain that my stomping around the house growling got very tedious for adults long before it lost fascination for me. I’m so happy that my mom’s reaction was on the level of “Even dragons have to carry their dishes to the sink, and then you should go next door and see if any knights want to play with a dragon over there.”

    Anyone suggesting that my interest in all things big and stompy, my tendency to dig in the backyard, my disdain for dresses I couldn’t run or play in the mud in meant that I was not a girl would have gotten short shrift. Anyone further suggesting that I ought to even see, never mind wear, plastic male genetalia would have been having some very uncomfortable conversations with the cops.

  47. GallusMag Says:

    This is kind of strange. The reporter that authored the original story which uncritically reported the pediatric dildos is Ginger Gorman. Ginger famously authored an article in 2010 that profiled two pedophiles who posed as a gay couple and purchased a Russian baby to rape. At their trial, video showed the men performing sex acts with the child starting at two weeks old. They toured the world for years selling the baby to other pedophile male rapists before their final arrest in 2011, a year after Gorman ran her piece on ABC News Australia.

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/2-convicted-adopted-son-porn-article-1.1385895

    Ginger Gorman’s profile served as an apologia for the men prior to their arrest. In her article she framed the investigation of the men as anti-gay discrimination.

    I had a hard time finding a copy of Ginger Gorman’s original article so I am going to archive it here.
    ——————————————————-
    [start]

    Headline: Two dads are better than one
    Date: 14 July, 2010 5:04PM AEST
    Author: Ginger Gorman

    A shiny child’s bike lies on its side on the front lawn of an immaculate garden.

    Around the back gay dads Pete and Mark chase their son’s pet chickens around, trying to catch them.

    Drake, 5, exclaims that the little birds are too fast for him.

    It’s a happy, relaxed family scene. But it wasn’t an easy road to get there. After many hurdles Drake was born by surrogacy in Russia.

    “We decided that we would have a child, that it was time for us to have a family. We wanted to experience the joys of fatherhood and we started our surrogacy over in the United States back in 2002,” Pete said.

    At the time, Pete and Mark were living and working in the US.

    “Surrogacy rules and laws are much easier in the United States,” Mark said.

    While not everybody was comfortable with the idea of surrogacy, Mark said the couple felt their options were limited.

    “We knew that there were certainly plenty of women willing to do it so if it OK with them, then I guess it was OK with us,” he said.

    Mark and Pete used the internet to find prospective mothers for the child they longed to have. Apart from the woman’s health, Pete said one of the big concerns was how genuine the candidates were.

    “We have heard about a lot of scams and certain people who represent themselves as so-called surrogate mothers who are really out there just to make money,” he said.

    Pete said the couple also wanted to make sure that any woman they employed as a surrogate fully understood the commitment she was making.

    There was also the issue of whether the mother would actually give up her baby, Mark added.

    After many failed attempts in the US, the cost was becoming prohibitive. The pair decided to try Russia as cheaper alternative.

    That decision presented its own problems. Language was the main one. The couple took on a private Russian tutor and Pete gave up his job in Australia to oversee the process.

    “We were very dedicated to making this work….we decided that at some point we didn’t have a budget. Our budget was anything that we had earned, anything that we had saved, anything that we could borrow to make this happen,” Pete said.

    In the end Pete said they found a woman who they ‘clicked with personality-wise’.

    “She was very quiet. She didn’t have a lot of demands or conditions that some of the other woman that we had met had. She seemed like somebody we could work with,” he said.

    At the first attempt, Drake was conceived via artificial insemination using Mark’s sperm.

    When asked why it was Mark’s sperm and not Pete’s, Mark laughed.

    “A flip of the coin I think,” he said.

    During the pregnancy the couple stayed in limited contact with the mother via a translator. Mostly they were in touch just when there were practical things to care of such as visiting a doctor or getting an ultrasound.

    “We made it clear to her that we wanted her to take vitamins, that we wanted her to eat well. We provided the money to do that and we just had to hope that she would do it,” Mark said.

    Neither man was at Drake’s birth because they felt it was important to protect the mother’s privacy.

    When their son was five days old, Mark and Pete were handed their child. To their surprise, Drake’s mother gave them the baby and walked away.

    “I think she had resigned herself to this much earlier on and was trying not to let emotions get in the way,” Mark said.

    In fact, it wasn’t the mother who got in the way of Drake coming back to Australia with his two Dads. What followed was two and a half years of bureaucracy before the child received permanent Australian residency and another year before he got citizenship.

    On arrival in Australia customs quizzed Mark and Pete for hours. Police were also sent around to their house on a Sunday morning to investigate.

    “When people see two guys together, you know it’s like, ‘Where’s his mother?’ We’ve had a lot of people ask that,” Pete said.

    “I think that even if one of us was a woman, we wouldn’t have had the same suspicions and problems that we went through.”

    Thinking back to the police visit, Pete said the police seemed to want reassurance that the situation was ‘right’.

    They checked if the couple had equipment to raise a child like a bed, clothes and bottles.

    Mark said he’s sure that they were under suspicion of paedophilia. But despite the difficulties, he said the couple would do it again with no hesitation.

    “We’re a family just like any other family,” he said with pride.
    ——————————
    [end]

    • GallusMag Says:

      Gorman attributed criticism of her reporting, namely her failure to fact-check the pedophilia accusations- to the homophobia of her critics.

      “Some of the hateful tweets and blog posts have questioned my journalistic integrity and accused me of assisting these paedophiles. My story went to air in July 2010. It was not until August 2011 that Newton and Truong came to the attention of New Zealand police. Until now, neither Newton or Truong had prior convictions. Unless you frequented paedophilic chat rooms online, there was no way to know that Newton and Truong weren’t the pair of loving dads they presented themselves as.

      When Caro Meldrum-Hanna’s report on this story went to air on ABC TV’s 730 program on Tuesday July 2, a friend of mine in Melbourne sent me a text message. “Wow. They look so normal”, he wrote of Newton and Truong. And that’s the uncomfortable truth about a case like this: hateful crimes can be done by people who look just like you and me.

      For me, there is another truth to be salvaged from this quagmire. If I went back to June 2010 and I was faced with the same situation, would I do anything differently?

      The answer is no, I wouldn’t.”

      http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-07-10/gorman-second-thoughts/4809582
      ————–

      “Unless you frequented paedophilic chat rooms online, there was no way to know that Newton and Truong weren’t the pair of loving dads they presented themselves as.”

      Except that the men reported that they were under active investigation for pedophilia to Gorman. She cited the investigation in her piece. Wtf.

    • morag99 Says:

      This Ginger Gorman, it looks like she has written at least 3 pieces that could be construed as sympathetic to sexual abusers of children. Sure, the first time could be regarded as bad luck or bad judgement — a mistake. But, after being supposedly tricked once, to do it again and again? There’s something wrong here. Witness this twitter exchange:

      “Francois Tremblay ‏@TPrimeDirective 23h23 hours ago
      @freshchilli Pushing a 4 year old to identify as a gender, to the expense of their freedom of thought, is child abuse.

      “Ginger Gorman ‏@freshchilli 22h22 hours ago
      @TPrimeDirective If you read the story, it doesn’t say that at any point.”

      ____

      Huh? She says that her story “doesn’t say that at any point.” Well, obviously not! So, she doesn’t understand implication, interpretation, slant, reading-between-the-lines, yet calls herself a journalist?

      There is something very chilling about her literal approach and flat, emotionless tone when challenged on a very emotionally-loaded subject. She gives off a creepy feeling of “there’s no there there.” This woman lacks; something essential is missing.

  48. Stop Pedophilia!!! Says:

    What the hell? Wtf? Hope you guys get arrested! This is pure pedophilia! Sick and twisted!


  49. […] Baby’s First Dildo -courtesy of the Transgender Movement | GenderTrender […]


  50. what is wrong with nowadays society, they’re children… They don’t think nor realize abput their sexuality untul puberty.
    in order to this, i can inmediayely relate it to pedo men… I mean, WHAT THE FUCK???

  51. **mandy Says:

    Why would any young girl want a penis


  52. And this is yet another piece of evidence for why i have believed that the “Trans” movement is VOMIT INDUCING filth.

  53. I'm No Cissie Says:

    Absolutely perverse. Just perverse.

    I am sad that that site owner and so many of the people promoting and lauding this are female. : (

    Also, I have to loudly agree with this commenter:

    “Why would any young girl want a penis?”

    Indeed. They want to play with trucks or climb trees or collect bugs; as a consequence of their improper desires, they will be made to wear a strap-on or suction cup dildo.

    Disgusting, child abuse, perverse, damnable.

  54. OK2BGAY Says:

    Shits’ fucked up…

  55. Elias Says:

    almost all of you dont have any idea of what this is all about. like if a penis doesnt work for anything else than sex, is for peeing! as a transman i would had been so happy if i have had the opportunity to transition in an early age and peeing in a urinal like any other boy, all you say its a “female hating” thing but dont you think its a “male hating” thing to think than anyone with a penis only thinks in sex, flesh or plastic, even with a plastic penis i wouldnt think in sex more than the usual. making a boy use this against his will obviously its wrong, but if somebody goes to back in time and ask if i wanted this i would have say absolutely yes. i used to put some toilet paper in my pants, not for sexual arousal or anything similar, just like an anguish palliative for the missing thing, all this subconsciously. not every trans in the male shade needs or wants something like those, and are ok with their bodies… but some of us dont, and its not like i hate my body or doesnt accept it but i need something there because my brain says it should be there. and btw this web store is old, the kid packers where out of stock but is not a new thing.

    • GallusMag Says:

      “..the kid packers where out of stock but is not a new thing.”
      Did you attempt to purchase a “kid packer”?
      Can you show us any other sites selling “kid packers”?

      “..if a penis doesnt work for anything else than sex, is for peeing!”

      In what way does a “kid packer” assist with urination?

      How old are you?

      • Elias Says:

        im a 26 years old trans male, i was seeking for adult prosthesis but i saw the for parents section because this was something i never saw before in other webstores and is so cool, because there a plenty of brands and levels or realism but all for adult size, this because is new the information and the possibility to transition younger, when i was a kid this was an impossible, no one knew what is trans and that this could be happening to me and it wasnt an illness. i know a mother of a ftm kid and he is in transition about 4 years ago and is like 9 years old now and this kid wants to go to the urinals too, but the size of the regular prosthesis are to big fot his age and i havent seen other brands to offer something like this but when i saw this webstore they havent been selling, it said out of stock, maybe they have who can make this prosthesis again. so this could be so useful at least for this kid who wants to go like others of his age instead of sitting. this material is so soft (they are all made is soft silicon, just the adult size has other devices to achieve an erection) it doesnt work for intercourse or make any kind of sexual stimulation. is just like a funnel to give the urine flow direction to pee while standing, there are other presentations that doesnt even have the look of a penis but if you want to go and want to look more natural, for your self or even if somebody see you by mistake dont notice your condition… is not a thing of shame, is for comfort and sometimes can be to be safe, a lot of people can get aggressive in so many levels and a lot of us kind of live stealth, at least with people we dont know.

      • Elias Says:

        and this web site i discover it like 3 or 4 years ago… they havent being selling this packers but the section was there since then. just where out of stock

    • Bea Says:

      We all know what it’s for.

      I call bullshit because kids aren’t equipped with complex anatomical understanding. Hell, lots of us didn’t even discover our clitorises until our teen years and beyond! Sounds like you had an obsession. Female bodies aren’t “missing” anything by not having a cock and balls, that’s the most Freudian idiocy I’ve heard all day.

    • MaryMacha Says:

      Elias, I’m sorry you learned to hate yourself at such a young age. I hope you manage to get some real psychological help from someone who isn’t brainwashed to think males can become females and vice versa. You’re not a guy and you never will be. There is nothing wrong with being a woman. It’s actually quite wonderful.

  56. neko Says:

    I had to make sure this isn’t a fake article. This transgender shit is going TOO far! Dildos for “transgender” children? Fuck outta here! This is sick! And why there’s a such thing as “transgender” children? An adult trans is one thing but a child???? Wtf a child knows about being transgender? If your kid was born with a penis that kid is male. He is a boy! Your kid has a vagina, female. She is a girl! Case closed! And fuck anybody that get in their feelings about what I said!

  57. dp Says:

    There’s quite a bit of outrage coming from the comment section of this article as there should be but as usual feminists are a little confused as to what they should be outraged about. Anyone mentally sound would be appalled over the fact that a child’s undeveloped mind is being tampered with at such a vulnerable stage in life by their deranged parents. Judging by the comments however, many are upset because they perceive this as a misogynist patriarchal attempt to demean and destroy the female gender under the transgender banner.
    It’s worth pointing out that feminists are typically in full support of male children transitioning to the female gender. From pumping boys full of hormones not meant for their bodies to surgically removing their male genitalia before puberty, feminists are more than happy to cheer them on. Not like there’s a need to point out how anti-male modern feminism is but the fact is they’re upset over girls standing up to take a piss. Hypocrisy much?

    Like it or not, this IS the direction our society’s heading. We will be remembered as a society that allowed and accepted this type of child abuse and future generations will shake their heads in disbelief as to how any one of us could have sat back and did nothing. They’ll see us as a culture of scared apathetic fools so blinded by political correctness we were unable to acknowledge the shame of what we’d become. A time in history when humanity traded logic and morality for something less offensive.

    • australopithecene Says:

      Thanks for the mansplaination of what feminists think!

    • Loup-loup garou Says:

      The article is about a girl, therefore the discussion is focused on girls. However, I can’t think of a single commenter on this or other gender-critical blogs who 1) agrees with the radical feminist analysis of gender and 2) supports the transitioning of male children — never mind cheering it on. Neutering children and turning them into cosmetic approximations of the other sex through surgery and hormones is abuse, period.

    • LC Says:

      I get the feeling you got lost on your way to a different website. If you really gave a shit about those boys(or girls), you wouldn’t be telling gender-critical feminists to accept this social nonsense. Thanks for stopping by and wringing your hands futilely at the state of the world, I guess.

    • MaryMacha Says:

      “It’s worth pointing out that feminists are typically in full support of male children transitioning to the female gender.”

      Maybe the fun libfems you tend to come across. I don’t see anyone here encouraging the mutilation of boys. You are believing what you want to believe. People who believe in transing children believe in transing both male and female children. Those who are opposed are also consistent in their opposition for both sexes. I have never heard anyone say that they favor the transing of boys only. I think you are making that up.

      • stchauvinism Says:

        Right, anti-feminist men of one sort blame feminists for opposing transgenderism and causing the imaginary deaths of 50,000 transwomen and anti-feminist men of another sort blame feminist for creating transgenderism cause castrating bitches and all that. Funny how politically opposed anti-feminist men both think that the male dominated medical-pharmaceutical industry is run by a secret cabal of radical feminist. Trans and conservatives are different ends of the same dog.

    • coelacanth Says:

      Your comment reminded me of a scene from the 1958 movie The Ten Commandments when Charleton Heston as Moses was asked what country he represented and in a portentious booming voice of arrogant pomposity and self-smugness, he declared “I am from the kingdom of The Most High”. Well la dee dah for you.

    • Ashland Avenue Says:

      Hey dp, did you bother to read ANYTHING else posted at this site before spewing your drivel? Anything at all? Seems not, or you’d realize where we’re at here, ideologically speaking. But no, you spotted a feminist site, and had to jump in and attack with your “misandry” bullshit. You’re throwing us in with funfems, you fucking idiot. Like many a male, you’re barging in to sanctimoniously set everyone “straight” with little to no awareness of to whom you’re speaking, or even the history of the topic at hand. That alone makes me disregard you as a troll. Sit down, STFU, and go read.

  58. Elias Says:

    surely a lot of you dont have the ability to be in somebody elses shoes and of course dont take a little time to chat with a trans person (informed and with the ability to explain her/him/zir… self to others) of what this is really about, how you feel. dont know nothing of theories or hypothesis of how o why this happens or whats does the word gender really means, this in english but even in other countries and languages means, or at a philosophical way, how does the development works either physically or psychologically. just go throwing partial judgments criticizing something you dont know a shit about beacuse you are not living it and you dont care to know or try to understand

    • MaryMacha Says:

      It happens because a) there’s a lot of money to be made by the transing professions, doctors, shrinks and pharmaceutical companies and b) it serves to diffuse movements for sex-parity and for LGB equal rights. Educate yourself.

    • I'm No Cissie Says:

      I don’t need to ask trans adults about this. I’ve raised children and I know that this is way, way, out of the realm of anything a young child would request or need. These items are being used to fulfill the needs of parents, not for the gender non-conforming child.

      That’s really all I need to know.

      Adults can buy all the silicone prostheses for themselves and use them any way they choose, except when they involve children.

      No child needs or should be given these devices.

    • Bea Says:

      Except a lot of people who support this blog either ARE trans, have detransitioned from being trans, or “do not identify with the gender they were assigned at birth.” I used to have incredible “top dysphoria,” but I recovered from it by treating the organic cause, not latching onto some woo-woo pseudoscientific crap that claims I need to butcher my breasts.

    • Ashland Avenue Says:

      Elias, you child, I’ve been following the trans B.S. for longer than you’ve been walking. I don’t need you to tell me that I “need to get educated” – a favorite line of the trannies. I understand, all right, I just disagree. THAT is a concept trannies just can’t seem to grasp.

    • Loup-loup garou Says:

      Elias, many commenters here — including myself — have been either in or around what used to be called the lesbian and gay community, and is now the “LGBT” community, for a long time. And by a long time, I mean decades.

      That inevitably means you meet and have conversations with trans people. Some of them I’ve liked as individuals, some I haven’t. Some of the ones born female have had life experiences very similar to mine, but have come to different conclusions about what those experiences mean. They’re adults and can do what they want, but I draw the line at medical interventions on children and teenagers and attempts to drag sex-role non-compliant adults under the so-called “trans umbrella.”

    • Zaucy Says:

      Here’s what I see a lot and don’t understand, and you can swap the sex order it’s the same either way…

      Someone is a girl but feels like they should be a guy. Ok, they transition, now they’re a guy. They’re attracted to women, right? No, they’re attracted to men.

      So why transition?? They were born a girl but they really should have been a gay guy? Or born a guy but should have been a lesbian? It’s as if they have the sexual attraction right, but something in the brain is wrong. I just don’t get it.

      I don’t mean to offend anyone, this is an issue that puzzles me.

      • Bea Says:

        Zaucy, the answers to this are complicated and diverse, but I’ll throw out a few common reasons a heterosexual female would transition to “gay guy.”

        — Young het women fetishizing “twinks” and wanting to be a part of the gay community & not just “boring straight women.” Lots of these women are autistic and relate to the yaoi genre of anime, which features idealized fantasies of feminine gay male relationships.
        — Heterosexual women desiring an escape from misogyny.
        — “Dysphoria” which is basically a combination of depression, anxiety, obsession, body dysmorphia, and sensory issues. Testosterone generally exacerbates these problems.
        — They don’t like stereotypical “girl” hobbies (see “escape from misogyny”).

        As for guys who transition to “become lesbians,” they are generally autogynephiles who are aroused at the thought of possessing a female body. They are autosexual and want to embody the object of their desires. Sometimes it’s an escape from depression as estrogen has antidepressant properties, and MRA types believe women to be privileged. Once they start becoming the target of misogyny, they chalk it up to transphobia and mansplain to women why it’s so hard to be trans.

      • GallusMag Says:

        lololol actual lol

  59. Justin Says:

    Ok so isn’t it illegal to sell sex toys to minors???? How’s about we report these assfuckers selling these things….

  60. John Smith Says:

    Dolphin-dive into an oven, you fucking sick cunt.

    • Ashland Avenue Says:

      Awww, wassa matter, pointing out misogynistic bullshit is upsetting to you? GOOD. I enjoy your discomfort. It pleases me.

  61. Be Kind Says:

    Thanks Elias,
    Den Tucker doesn’t make dildos for young people. He is not a paedophile. He helped me at a time when my young trans kid was desperate. My kid wanted to be able to swim with his mates and play sports without feeling different and being exposed. Standing to pee has advantages that all women with vulvas can appreciate. Again, for a trans person, it can make them feel a little less different and a bit more like they fit in. It is not to do with sexuality and sexual pleasure.
    I doubt I will convince any of you of the existence of trans kids. My kid doesn’t like that label. He just feels – unrelentingly – that he is a boy. This is *child led*. I can’t think how any parent would want this for their child. I know his life is going to be unconventional and at times very difficult. However, after years of trying other methods – including endlessly encouraging the idea that he could continue to play football and wear boy’s clothes but keep a female identity – I now have a child who has returned to school, reestablished friendship groups, curbed anxiety attacks and sleeps and eats normally. Frankly, if purchasing a silicone device helps to enable all of this it is a very very small price to pay. I don’t fully understand it, I don’t even like it, but I’m willing to do it if it helps my child to feel whole and to find their way in the world.
    Den runs a small, community based business. I am so glad he exists. Truly, he is a gentle, generous, kind individual who understood our problem and helped us sensitively and privately. Please stop haranguing him. It does nothing for your movement to focus hate on individuals who least deserve it.

    • LC Says:

      A female can stand to pee with their natural biology, if given training and education. All this does is encourage kids to embrace self-hatred, self-obsession, and living a lie. Your daughter will never fit in by pretending to be something she’s not, and you would spare her a lot of pain by telling her that now- the way any good parent would.

    • kesher Says:

      How does your kid deal with washing the thing out after each use? Or do you buy diaper cream in bulk?

    • Elias Says:

      i just can imagine what dificulties you had passed and still or my mother had been through, is a process and nobody has ever said that all girls with tendencies to the cliche of the “boys activities” are trans, even there is a weird thing happening with the terms in english language (my fist language isnt english, im from another contry) because still are differences between trans, and a little war is happening in my group of trans people in my country because of the US terms, some people just transition socially they are ok with keeping their bodies as they are and feel comfortable and in connection with the parts they have. but some of us dont, it doesnt mean i hate myself, maybe i could never have the crs and its ok, its just i do have these weird phenomena that amputee have, a ghost. dont try to understand it, i havent at first, i could identify it because of and accident in which i broke my arm and lose a lot of nerves and experienced that, affortunately i keep my arm but learned to identify it and my other ghost was so much more sutil to know what it was before that experience with the arm. but you just know unconsciously the missing thing, is not because society says you have to have a dick to be male. i experienced this sensation at a very young age, and it had nothing to do with the activities i did or how i was raised, actually i didnt have that much trouble with the girls stuff but i wanted to be seen as i was but then i thought i was the one who was wrong, not because somebody told me just notice how people would saw if i did something different from what i was told or what you learn from movies or any other thing that you are not in the right place. just adjust yourself to be safe and to be accepted but left you with a profound wound because of the holding back and self negation. i admire you for the help and understanding you are putting on your child happiness, i wish i would have that opportunity but back then there was no such thing as transitioning or any information. you are doing the right thing, even if i wasnt the case and decides not to continue the transition it doesnt matter, is socially and wont left anything irreversible, at least not important or that affects “her” future, believe me is more the damage of being so unhappy and nobody to believe and help you, thats why is important to have a professional who do knows about this subject in a positive and child leading like you said to know what your kid feels, it doesnt mean you are going to accomplish every thing if is not the time to, is a long process but being less alone it would be so much easy. there are a lot of people, ignorant people who will throw stupid commentaries like if they know what it its like, say im ill but they dont even know me, be strong the things are changing so fast and new generations are kinder and a lot more able to understand and have the will to see themselves in the situation of others. no body would like to pass through this but this is what it is, it happens and the only thing you can do is hold on and be brave and try to be happy with what you have, if its your natural body or the tools you can reach to help. anything is wrong if you use it to make the best to be fine. you want to protect the kid, but you cant put him in a bubble, and wont let him ride a bike because he could fell and have some scratches even if it wasnt the path for his/her way it worth the try, step by step, a lot of people see this like a complete chage of life, but its not, my life changed a lot to me but in the level of happiness i achieved, for others it was so smooth, even told me i was again myself, before all the angry, sad and bitter i became after so much time of forcing myself to be who i was supposed to but i was not. i tried really hard, right now i dont know if hate myself a little bit for not standing for myself like a lot of kids now these days, i dont know if i was brave and strong to shut up and try to be happy as i was supposed to but i wasnt, or weak and scared to do something and speak up. right know it doesnt matter any more, you cant focussed on the past or you are lost, its time to think in the future. i wish all the luck for you and your kid and that everything goes fantastic from now to whatever holds the road for you two (or more if more family is involved) like the classic “it gets better” it is already better now. thank you for the support among all this unkind and harmful people here.

    • Rebecca Says:

      Not even going to read this garbage! You’re full of shit, period! There are many, many ways to raise a child who may or may not be struggling with identifying his or her gender. A lot of this is perfectly natural. You job as a parent is not to make that decision yourself, but to become as knowledgeable as possible about the subject, consult medical professionals and in the mean time focus on nuturing the child, reading the child for school and keeping the child ex[psed and engaged in as many activities as possible where social skills, confidence and self-esteem will grow. Because, at the end of the day, these skills are what will help the child cope in life. Otherwise, those of you who are perverted as hell and want to take advantage of or exploit a child’s “confusion” need to be locked up! You and your ilk have no clue what proper child rearing is! You’re sick and you know it so don’t try to hide behind the whole transgender issue! The U.S. and other countries are showing great leadership in support of the rights of those citizens with unique life styles. Those children don’t need anything from you expect for you to keep your filthy hand off of them! Especially those innocent babies! What the fuck is wrong with you?! You can paint Den Tucker a saint, sporting a halo and wings but rational, sane and decent people know he’s a filthy pig! He and anybody who supports this poor excuse for a human should be thoroughly ashamed of yourselves! I pledge and vow to fight for the rights, the safety and well being of any baby or child who has had to endure abuse of any type or is at risk because of anything directly or indirectly related to this low life!

  62. Arise Says:

    Express your concern.

    (415) 317-6323
    Address:
    84 Entrada Ct
    San Francisco, California 94127-2815
    Boisland Enterprises is a small, fairly new business consulting company in San Francisco, California. It opened in 2010 and now has an estimated $190,000 in yearly revenue and approximately 4 employees.

  63. Dom Says:

    There’s a special place in hell

  64. ea Says:

    so, you are banning “elias” comments for too lazy to read, or make you uncomfortable that someone who really knows speak up among this shitty coments

    • GallusMag Says:

      Your comments have become progressively unreadable walls of text. And now you are referring to yourself in the third person. Not cool. That is why your comments will no longer be published.

  65. T Says:

    This is one of the most disturbing things I’ve ever seen. Absolute unashamed promotion of abuse. Disgusting! Who ever is responsible should be put down !

  66. Kayla Says:

    Where the fuck does someone report this shit. This is stuff pedofiles yearn for. How in the Hell can they get away with this crap?! Using trans as a term to try and sell shit is ludicrous. Please tell me what fucking baby needs this! THIS IS THE KINDA SHIT THATS WRONG WITH AMERICA!!

  67. Martha Says:

    What the fuck is wrong with you people? Transgender or not, you are disgusting and should be in jail for pedophilia. This whole article makes me sick. Genderqueer. NO SHIT!!!!!

  68. jay Says:

    Makes me wounder how many kids has this guy touch be4 he came up with this…Thats why God’s wrath is coming..because we made it that way ,..yall wanted “YES WE CAN”….so now yall got it..

  69. tngirlinwa Says:

    I think you’d get a lot less “ew, gross” comments, and a lot more people to actually read everything through, if you replaced the word “dildo” in the title to the more accurate word “prosthetic”.

    • Teal Deer Says:

      “Ew, gross,” or better yet, “what the hell!” are the appropriate responses to these items. Talk about not reading!

    • RR Says:

      Right, we should call it by a different name to obscure the fact that these are dildos for little girls. It is no surprise that a tngirlinwa and his transpedo bros are making comments like this throughout this thread.

      A dildo is a fake penis and is still a dildo whether it is sitting on my coffee table or being used in a sex act. I can rest my feet on a dildo and it doesn’t become an ottoman. I can put my coffee on a dildo and it doesn’t become a coaster. You, sir, can cheer while deranged Munchausen mommies and daddies buy baby-sized dildos to stick down their 4 year old daughter’s pants, but a dildo in a a little girl’s underwear is not a “prosthetic” because little girls do not need a replacement penis, you sick dumb fuck. 0 is the definitive number of girls that need a penis shaped funnel to urinate in a restroom.

  70. 113directory Says:

    You fucking weirdos deserve the ugliest of scorn heaped on you. Pedophilia and looking at boy bulges makes you aroused?
    You’re exactly what is wrong in the United States.

  71. Rod Says:

    there is something seriously wrong with you this is so bad .nonce nonce nonce I am sick to my stomach

  72. moss Says:

    Wow, the people coming across gendertrender and leaving comments- so bizarre! Not sure if they know what they’re angry at exactly… just wish they realized this has nothing to do with homosexuality; I fear they think this is part of the ‘gay agenda.’ (& something to do with Obama I guess)

  73. FtM anon. Says:

    People, its a stand to pee device for transgender males. Not a dildo, or a sex toy. Trust me, young trans males know what a penis is, and that theirs is missing. Just let them pee like the other little boys.

    • GallusMag Says:

      You are a blatant liar. Strap on “packers” have nothing whatsoever to do with urination. And four year old girls are not “missing” penises.

    • kesher Says:

      Little boys aren’t using a device that will stink of pee and continue to leak urine on their skin and clothes after use.

    • Siobhan Says:

      If all they want is to stand to pee, there are some easy-to-clean devices such as the pTouch and the goGirl which can be used to make that happen, without wearing a bizarre strap-on dildo which will probably cause yeast infections and skin irritation.

      No my friend, if you look around that web site you will see that this manufacturer specializes in small-sized fake genitals of both boys and girls for masturbation purposes. They recommend “fingering” these devices for pleasure. These are geared toward that part of the population which is aroused by the thought and image of molesting children.

    • Em Says:

      A girl who feels bereft of a penis is best served by gentle adult insistence on biological reality, and by a family and society that do not devalue people with female genitalia.

      These abhorrent prosthetic devices are made and sold for the benefit of adult perverts. Trust me.

    • Franklin Says:

      They are not little boys. There’s your first problem.

  74. mharper1121 Says:

    Okay, let’s face it. Their marketing and naming system sucks. But honestly, as a trans woman, I’ve been wearing forms of various sizes since before my sister hit puberty. I had to make my first few sets myself because nobodyade them for pubescant trans girls. If the situation were reversed, and I were a ten year old trans boy, you’d be damn right I’d be grateful to buy from them. Especially considering they’re one of the few sellers out there.

    • GallusMag Says:

      What’s that you’re saying about your pre-pubertal sister?

      • mharper1121 Says:

        I was using her (being cis, and therefore following the female biological timeline by default) as an example. She’s only three years younger than me. I started wearing sports bras just about six months before she started training bras. We were the same size and Mom didn’t know, so my sporties kept getting mixed into her laundry.

        Basically the usual two sisters shitshow that you probably went through. Now, were my sister transitioning like I did, a packer would be her next birthday present.

      • GallusMag Says:

        Using your sister as an example of what?
        You said:
        “I’ve been wearing forms of various sizes since before my sister hit puberty. I had to make my first few sets myself because nobodyade them for pubescant trans girls.”

      • mharper1121 Says:

        Think. Use that brain we think you have and maybe you’ll find your answer.

        Nobody made breast forms in the sizes that would look natural on a young girl, so I made them myself. Due to my sister’s starting to come in at the same time and us being clever, we figured out that it wouldn’t happen on its own. So she and I decided to work together.

        In this case, she was an example of the developmental timeline that I should have followed, and due to my physiology, didn’t.

        In the spirit of the original article, you and I both know if she had been the trans one, she would have known. If I was a trans man, then I would have known. There are many childhood experiences that you may not remember. Many conversations that would be scandalous if published. But only because of trolls like you that use someone’s examples to derail a conversation.

        Point I made originally is that if the situation were reversed, then I’d be more than happy to have had one of these growing up.

        And to the woman who claimed one of those packers had a suction cup. That’s what’s called a funnel. It’s a simple device used to direct the flow of fluids that has been in use for thousands of years. Amusing, what you see in that, considering suction cups rely on more complicated principals.

      • GallusMag Says:

        How did your younger sister assist you in making your pubescent female breast forms?

        “So she and I decided to work together.”

      • mharper1121 Says:

        By being clever, as women tend to be. Give you a hint. It involved silicone caulk, acetone, a ziploc bag, and creative use of a hot glue gun.

      • dsgr554 Says:

        Josh dugger did the same thing in the name of a religion that tells him women are objects to be used by men…, what is the difference between you and him again?

      • mharper1121 Says:

        Duggar? Seriously? My sister’s the one who VOLUNTEERED to make my forms. The entire Duggar line is a gang of sick hypocrites, and while I am also not well, I would never use her for something she didn’t explicitly say was okay.

        The sense in which I am not well is the idea that I don’t look to women with lust and possession, but envy. I wish I had their form and ability. I wish I could be a mother, and my sister helped me in the persuit to be more like her. By her own free will.

        Free will and doing something because you think it will help someone you care about isn’t something you may be familiar with, whether ingrained by your parents or by someone stabbing you in the back, I frankly don’t care. I made my point, and you made yours.

        I agree that these child packers are badly marketed and a terrible idea. But were I in a position to find that useful to me, I would have given my soul for it. As I would have given my soul to be like every other girl in elementary school in stead of hiding behind prosthetics and destroying my body in the attempt.

      • dsgr554 Says:

        Why are you here defending sex toys for children?

        The thing with your sister and making her the focus of your blame for you making items of a sexual nature for yourself is another matter, but you are doing the same thing Josh D did.. Josh assumed it was ok to use his sisters to explore sexually. Did your ‘transition’ begin at the same time as your sister’s puberty?

        It is just odd you would go out of your way to post on this blog just to mention your personal inappropriate contact with your sister was ok when you did it, and you are here defending strap-ons for four year olds.

      • GallusMag Says:

        “There are many childhood experiences that you may not remember. Many conversations that would be scandalous if published.”

        What does this mean?

      • Siobhan Says:

        Sounds like a disgusting man fantasy about his sister. Ugh. These guys think that growing up female is one big 1960s Disney slumber party. I grew up in a family with sisters both older and younger, and believe me, we never compared breast sizes or even discussed puberty. Such a thing would be unthinkably embarrassing. Ick.

        Back to the original fake penis for girls whose parents want them to pretend they are boys discussion, as a mom of an actual boy, I can tell you that little boys never have much of a “bulge.” Genitals are small at that age. I certainly never noticed anything of the sort in grammar school. Kids are usually pretty clueless and embarrassed by any discussion of genitals, unless they are being sexualized and/or molested by creepy adults.

      • Franklin Says:

        Hilarious how Gallus can immediately pinpoint the mental disorders from just a few lines and zoom in on them like a heat-seeking missile.

      • Bea Says:

        “The sense in which I am not well is the idea that I don’t look to women with lust and possession, but envy.”

        Creepy. Obsessive envy over female bodies and “female roles” is how serial killers come to be. Especially males who say they “are not well.”

    • GallusMag Says:

      “..I’ve been wearing forms of various sizes since before my sister hit puberty.”

      What does this mean, mharper1121? About your sister?

      • stopthemadness Says:

        Lord they just can’t help being creeps, can they?

      • Ashland Avenue Says:

        I have absolutely NO idea what the fuck he’s babbling about. And the “usual two sisters shitshow”?! Because…his underwear was in the laundry with hers?! What a deeply disturbed (and disturbing) man.

      • Mortadella Says:

        Um, he wanted to be his sister? Because, uh, she was there in the same house with him?
        And the tone, like, that’s something that happens to everyone, and well, duh.

      • Mortadella Says:

        Yes. And once again, I can’t get over the tone — like, “Of course I wanted to become my sister, that’s common. What, are you people vanilla/muggles/mundanes, or what?”

        What kind of bubble does one have to live in to think coveting your sister’s body, like it’s some kind of luxury condo, isn’t unhealthy?

      • BadDyke Says:

        “he used his prepubescent sister as a resource to further his own desires instead of respecting her as a full person with bodily integrity.” And of course Jazz said the same thing about his sister Ari (Although she has supposedly ‘volunteered’ now to be a surrogate).

        Same ole, same ole, just the amount of pink and sparkly varies……………..

      • gchild Says:

        “…since before my sister hit puberty…”

        This was dropped so causually was’nt it?

        Why does this shit keep circling back around to children all the fucking time? Huh? Why?

        When will we face this like we had to face pedophile priests? Some cultural institutions are conducive to sexual deviants. Maybe not sexual deviancy itself (although this is debatable in our cultural climate) but actual sexually deviant people. Trans might be one of them.

        The “baby dildos” will make people back up a bit. Trans allies won’t take an active stand against this, but they will pull away. In their homes and personal lives. Some will stop being so openly open. Others will tiptoe sideways out the back door without turning in their ally badges. Still others will break the hell out of tran activism like they caught chicken pox.

        “Baby dildos” won’t be stopped, just dropped.

      • kesher Says:

        “Some cultural institutions are conducive to sexual deviants. Maybe not sexual deviancy itself (although this is debatable in our cultural climate) but actual sexually deviant people.”

        There’s a common theme to those institutions — men. Not just that men are present but that men dominate those institutions and women either aren’t present or have very little power.

        Many nuns tried to stop the pedophile priests but were stonewalled by the entirely male Catholic leadership. The abuse committed by Jerry Sandusky was a similar story. How many women are leaders in college sports, especially men’s college sports? None? Of course the men in charge let Sandusky rape children unhindered. It’s a male prerogative not to protect children or women from male sexual predation especially when it’s other people’s children or “other men’s” women who are abused.

        The trans movement is a male supremacy movement, and children, women, and effeminate MTTs are the ones suffering at the hands of heterosexual pigs in wigs. This won’t change as long as the old white men are in charge.

      • Bea Says:

        So he’s been scrutinizing his sister’s body since before she hit puberty…and he’s “only” three years older. An 11 year old girl with a 14 year old brother (probably in full pubescent autogynephilia-porn-mode) who is basing his breast forms off her body? Eww. And how long did this go on?

      • MaryMacha Says:

        Great, another dude training to compete against real women cyclists.

      • kesher Says:

        I wonder if he’s even gotten his dick inverted. The Olympics is about the only game in town at least trying to keep trans laydees from supplanting real women athletes with the no dick policy.

    • Em Says:

      @mharper 1:32 am: “Many conversations that would be scandalous if published. But only because of trolls like you that use someone’s examples to derail a conversation.”

      We may not be having the conversation you would like us to have, but that does not mean the conversation has been derailed. Believe me, we know exactly what we’re talking about.

      And we know exactly what you’re talking about, too, buster.

      • GallusMag Says:

        Yeah, he’s saying he modeled (or cast?) pubescent silicone breast forms off of his younger sister’s body. Very ‘Silence of the Lambs’.

      • australopithecene Says:

        Yeah, he used his prepubescent sister as a resource to further his own desires instead of respecting her as a full person with bodily integrity. Because females are resources to be used, whether they’re children or not. And this is completely uncontroversial to him because he’s a male supremacist.

      • GallusMag Says:

        I wonder how many wearable pubescent body parts he made off of her body. Was it just breasts, or other parts too? Did he have a whole drawer full?

      • Pf Says:

        I have a sister. Yes, we have worn each other’s clothing on occasion – but no, I find nothing relatable in calling the relationship between sisters a “shitshow”. Nor in the frankly creepy attempt to recreate her body for her brother’s use.

      • Newbie Says:

        Don’t forget his eagerness to provide her a mold of his penis if she were trans*****. Sisterly love!

        Isn’t that the birthday gift every girl wants from her big brother?


    • “they’re one of the few sellers out there.”

      Gee, I wonder why that is?

  75. Thomas Says:

    There are many transfolk who have kids… being trans doesn’t equate with pedophilia. Now if a veteran had a prosthetic, would you consider that disgusting as well… because they lost an arm or leg? Really its no different. Most packers and STP prosthetic can’t be used for penetration. Think about that.

    • kesher Says:

      Prosthetic limbs are meant to give a person functionality with their fake arm or leg, especially now that arm prosthetics are more advanced than basic claws or hooks. They are not meant to give a person a feeling of not having lost their arm or leg. That would be absurd. What need is being fulfilled by giving a young child a genital packer other than supporting her supposed “phantom limb” feeling? Are there 4-year-olds who experience that, or is this yet another example of creepy trans adults imposing their own issues onto young children?

      The alleged functionality with regard to urination is a fantasy at best. These things can only be used for that purpose if the young girl washes it out after each use unless she wants to smell like urine 24/7.

      • ex home birther Says:

        I am certain that there is no prosthetic for boys that have lost their penis through injury (or else transactivists would not have invented these). It doesn’t make any sense. What is in your pants is meant to be private the vast majority of the time.

    • Fuck You Says:

      You people are dumb as rocks. You are what’s wrong with the world today. Your ignorant prattle and following and equally ignorant blogger shows the world of sheeple I live in. It isn’t a fucking dildo you stupid fucking prats.

    • Bea Says:

      Girls haven’t “lost” a penis. Most of us are born with fully functioning urethras capable of urination.


  76. I have to assume these kids are all home-schooled. Because the first time a teacher has to help one of the kids in the bathroom, a not infrequent occurrence, they’re going to call CPS. And some judge is going to have these people put on a 72-hour hold. I don’t care how you rationalize it, this makes no goddamned sense.


  77. That site looks like a porn site circa 1999. I wouldn’t trust a device purchased there anywhere near my child. Given the level of crazy out there how do these people know there’s not a tracking device or even a camera in the damned thing? You can’t just buy some crap off the internet and put it a child’s drawers, ffs! The lack of foresight here is simply appalling.

  78. trevor punt Says:

    i think a lawsuit should be in order for this company!!!!!!!!!

  79. Mortadella Says:

    The visitors who swung by today are an interesting bunch. Huffy, conservative anti-feminist types who are totally confused, pedo supporters and Buffalo Bill fanboys. Weird cross-section. But they all have one thing in common; they think women are weird non-men objects

  80. heather Says:

    this is disgusting

  81. mimi Says:

    As if it would make a difference if you call it Dildo or Packer. Its a fucking silicone penis in adult male size that can have an erection and are made by a sex toy company. And these abominations are marketed towards little girls!

    Holy shit guys Wake up! Its a fucking sex toy. And you want children to wear these in the name oft trans actvism. You are sick and crazy.

    • liberalsareinsane Says:

      This is not a “trans activist” site. It’s the exact opposite. Try reading it. Same with all the other nitwits posting with: “YOU PEOPLE”.

  82. Seth bowser Says:

    You people and your uneducated drivel make me sick. Do some research. My source? I’m a trans person. I wish my parents had let me transition earlier in life. Maybe then it wouldn’t have been a living hell. What’s the point of this stuff you ask? Being able to use the damn bathroom in peace. STOP SEXUALIZING TRANSGENDER!

    • Bea Says:

      You stop sexualizing girlhood, you piece of shit!

    • australopithecene Says:

      She doesn’t need this thing to urinate, stupid.

    • atranswidow Says:

      I’ll think you’ll find that ”we people” actually do a lot of research and are fully educated on lots of issues that we’d, quite frankly, rather not be.

      Those ”packers” as you call them are manufactured and sold by a sex toy company. They are smaller replicas of adult penises. A prosthesis is a device, either external or implanted, that substitutes for or supplements a missing or defective part of the body. 4 year old girls do not have missing or defective genitalia. If they do then they would need appropriate medical treatment. Tell me one doctor who has actually advised a parent to purchase one of these for their child. Are they FDA approved medical devices or sex toys?

      I came across this today…..http://medcitynews.com/2015/09/fake-medical-devices-sold-couple-guilty-federal-court/……

      It just seems to me to illustrate just how gullible people can be to believe what they want to believe and how there are people out there who are willing to make a fast buck off that. I would like to believe that it is just gullibility on the part of parents,; the sexual element is just too stomach churning otherwise.

      And I am not sexualising transgender. It is all about sex; whether it’s late transitioning autogynephiles or young girls who are made to be ashamed of their own external genitalia at an age when they shouldn’t even be giving it a second thought.

      Girls can play with trucks, wear boys clothes and play football with the boys. Why do people have such a narrow view of sex roles’? For Seth’s benefit that is a rhetorical question.

      • kesher Says:

        Speaking of the hypersexual trans movement, the Federalist had a really good article on that subject: http://thefederalist.com/2015/06/03/how-the-hypersexual-trans-movement-hurts-feminism/

        It feels like gaslighting, this insistence on the part of trans activists that sex has nothing to do with this when a huge number of MTTs are hypersexual and are trying to impose their kinks on all the rest of us. This is similar to how we’re not “allowed” to talk about how many MTTs are convicted sex offenders because it makes the trans movement look bad.

    • gchild Says:

      They are called “packers”, not dildos, right?

      When a man is “packing”, it means he has a big penis. He is said to be “packing” (a large dick.)

      They are called “packers”. We did not name them.

    • CisWomanPrivilege Says:

      Stop sexualizing transgender you dare to say when you and your mentally ill sickos are sexualizing CHILDREN?!

      “This is a packer to STP and create da bulgeee!!!”. You want a bulge, why don’t you fill your underwear with foam or old rags like male strippers do? You want to stand to pee, why don’t you get a funnel? If this “packer” sole purpose is that, why the hell does it come with an erection mode? How the hell can you justify that this is made by a company who specializes in making sex toys that resemble the body of little girls for the pedos to buy?
      You seriously gotta be busted to defend this stuff, no wonder why you’re “trans”. Sick pervert.


    • The uneducated drivel of sexist stereotypical gender roles makes me sick.

      An entire generation of fem gay boys and dyke girls is being EUGENICIZED by identity politics.

      Go ahead, be “trans” anything, you are not changing sex and your capitulation to hypersexualized gender roles STINKS.

      Not gay rights, fetish and identity feelz rights. Bah.

    • kesher Says:

      If actual boys see a girl using that thing, she’ll be teased ruthlessly. Using the stall is much safer, so is using the *girls’* restroom. For a “man”, you sure don’t seem cognizant of how boys/men tend to behave.

    • Mortadella Says:

      We’re yelling at some a-holes for sexualizing children and you come in here yelling, “stop sexualizing trans.” You’re not making any sense. WTF are you talking about? Why would a girl need to wear an elaborate cod piece underneath her clothing unless her parents failed her and are unnaturally concerned about how strangers and onlookers see her private bits through her clothing? Is that a wholesome concern? Is it?

  83. tnmusicman Says:

    Why do we need something like this?? The idea that this is for kiddies is bad enough but what about the adults buying it FOR their kids??

  84. Miranda Says:

    Yeah, because every 4 year old child is worried about having that bulge in her panties. I read about this on Facebook, and had to research the site to see if it is real. Oh, it’s real 😫

    • LC Says:

      I was reluctant to post the link for anyone before doing the research myself… I thought it had to be a satirical site or a scam. No such luck, it seems😦

  85. TERFS suck Says:

    Amazing. TERFS who are oppressing another minority and to what end? Absolutely revolting. You took the original story totally out of context and put your own bigoted spin on it.
    You are disgusting human beings.

  86. australopithecene Says:

    The people defending this are working from the assumption that little girls need to have a fake cock for their health. I hate the way trans cheerleaders act like this matter is all settled, especially when they make no effort to provide a cogent argument or respond to challenges. It ain’t settled – not by a long, long way.
    Feminists have been doing a lot of reading about this the last few years and know that the arguments of the trans movement are nothing but hot air. There’s no science, no ethics, no logical reason to believe anything they claim. Trans is a predatory, narcissistic, male supremacist, sexually entitled, woman-hating movement that will happily devour children if that’s what it takes. Expect a fight, dudes.

    • nemesister Says:

      Plenty of us don’t have to read to know about this. We’ve been living with it for a very long time. OK we read the research too. But we know the trans stuff up close and personal. As long as it’s existed we’ve been watching things get more and more fucked up. I keep thinking it can’t get worse. Then they come up with something like this.

  87. Joe haymon Says:

    Well now. Half of u were all on the support gay rights movement. This is part of it. If u did it research before flying their flag, u would’ve known about this Pandoras box that is now open

    Moving forward, let’s not fly anyone’s flag flag just because society tells us its time to do so.

    • Janetwo Says:

      Eh? Gay sexual orientation is a natural variation found in many, many species. Trans is a denial of biology, of the sexual body. Supporting gay rights has nothing to do with supporting trannies.

    • GallusMag Says:

      Right wingers like Joe don’t really give a shit about harms to women and children caused by trans. If they did, they’d be organizing to help women like this one:
      https://gendertrender.wordpress.com/2012/07/20/ccwf-stop-male-inmate-richard-masbruch-from-being-housed-in-a-womens-facility/#comment-60713

    • australopithecene Says:

      The only thing the trans movement has to do with the gay rights movement is being T in the GLBT acronym. Most of these guys are straight. They even themselves say gender has nothing to do with sexual orientation (a lie). They do nothing to help gays and lesbians, they are parasites on their activism and resources. Plenty of gays and lesbians think the association is an egregious mistake.

    • Mortadella Says:

      Er, it sounds like you’re out of your depth here, joe. Do you know what a autogynephiliac is? Did you know most of them of them are straight males with a porn fetish? Bring your complaints to the patriarchy, dude. Porn taints everything now.

    • stchauvinism Says:

      Trans are your people, Joe, just ask Pat Robertson and other homophobes like him who think transgenderism is all godly and just peachy but homosexuality is a sin. Transgenderism is a conservative, anti gay and lesbian movement, they are your people. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/29/pat-robertson-transgender_n_3672244.html

    • Ashland Avenue Says:

      Joe, nuance of thought isn’t really your forte, is it?

      Gotta love how a dude comes in here and (however ineptly) tells us that we should’ve done our research. As if we haven’t been living this, reading about it, and dealing IRL with its perpetrators and victims. Joe’s arrogance is right up there with the most strident of the MtT.

    • MaryMacha Says:

      Joe, you’re very confused. This has nothing to do with gay. Think about it. Gay men are all about being men. They love and celebrate maleness in other men and they love their male bodies. Likewise lesbians are all about loving and celebrating woman-ness.

      Trans, on the other hand, is all about changing people’s bodies to conform to their own self-loathing and then appropriating the experiences and spaces reserved for their target sex.

      If anything, trans is diametrically opposed to actual gayness, which is predicated on same-sex attraction, not on dysphoria. While there may be overlaps in some people, the two are distinct experiences. Also, some type of body dysphoria or other is actually very common to a huge percentage of the population.

      Frankly, our movement for equality has been hijacked. This is not the natural result of it. The reasons are complex but trans has happened to some extent because otherwise unremarkable straight people want to be cool and queer but really don’t have any same-sex attraction in them. It also happens because sex-roles are straightjackets for a lot of people but not conforming to them gets you stigmatized as gay or lesbian. That’s why we have kids wanting to chop off body parts.

  88. Mickey Says:

    I mean no disrespect to anyone, im lesbian myself.
    I just dont agree with giving kids sex toys. Granted i know what the intwntions are. If the kids dont want to wear a dress fine if she does fine.
    Why buy a kid a dildo when you can buy them regular toys or learning tools. At 5 years old a child shouldnt be thinking about sex at all if you ask me.
    Let the kids be kids when they are old enough to underatand sex as a whole then thats different.
    I feel like when we do things like this we are forcing a sexual preference in a child, but give him or her time to grow. At 5 they are normally just curios about things

    • Jummy Says:

      This is being marketed to parents with emotional blackmail. The assault is aimed at the parent on two fronts:

      1) You, the parent, are cissexual. Blinded by your cispriveledge you cannot relate to your child’s struggle with gender identity. Your only role as a responsible, loving parent is to stand aside and support whatever comes next as your child is processed by professionals.

      2) Failure to provide for your child’s transitioning will cause suicide.

      In other words, If you don’t buy your child a ‘teenybopper packer’ they will kill themselves and your child’s blood will be on your hands. You’d have exposed yourself for a bigot and joined the likes of the racist parent who disowns his daughter for having a black boyfriend. Because psychology denialism is implicit within transphobia, you’d have also identified yourself as ‘anti-science’.

  89. lolterfs Says:

    so uch terf scum in here…../vomit

    • Mortadella Says:

      nutter

      • coelacanth Says:

        The use of “terf” is identical to the use of “commie” under McCarthy in the 1950s — IDENTICAL.

        McCarthyites could not get power by presenting their message on its own because it was just not palatable to the public; so they created a monster, “The Commie”, to galvanize the gullible and terrorize the intelligent — now you will buy our message because Monsters are coming to get you and if you reject us, then YOU are the Monster. Perfect totalitarian tactics.

        Trans has applied this strategy by creating the monstering concept called “Terf” to create terror and intimidation. The application of the terf concept is identical in tone and outcome as the use of the terms “commie” by the 1950s religious/political right wing or “witch” by the 1600s religious/political right wing. “Terf” is being used by Trans which is the 2000s religious/political right wing.

        If the public will not buy your message then create a scapegoat so they do not have to buy your message, rather they only have to be convinced to either run in fear from the scapegoat into the arms of that message or be branded as the scapegoat and punished. Same old, same old.

        Trans is the most reactionary social phenomenon of the past 40 years. The adult children who run Trans (anyone who challenges us is a terf) and the real children who consume Trans off the internet (gotta be a rebel and kill a terf) will be seen in the future as a classic example of totalitarianism.


  90. WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU PERVERTS, KILL YOURSELVES.


  91. I sort of wish Cecile Richards, facing the Republican politicians and being constantly interrupted (CLASSIC abuse pattern), had whipped out a picture of the “girldos” (dildos for girls) or whatever you want to call them, and the caption would read “Republicans Support Dildos For Girls – Planned Parenthood Supports GIRLS AND WOMEN.” Just go for it, blow the whole thing out of the water. Political suicide, but still a little part of me wishes some “linkages” would be made.

  92. David Rohan Says:

    I just want to say, this is not a dildo. A dildo is in the form of an erect penis for the purpose of sexual stimulation. This is so girls can pee standing up. Encouraging a 3-year old girl to believe that she is a physically f&$#ed up boy is horrifying enough without hysterically mislabelling the thing; that actually detracts from the indescribable insanity of the whole thing.
    All the parents out there that have their kids taken away for the most outrageous of reasons, and these parents who buy that shit are left alone or even praised.

    • GallusMag Says:

      The dildo expert has spoken.

      How do “packers” assist with urination, David?

      Pray tell. This should be interesting.

    • nemesister Says:

      Dude. One of these IS erect.

    • coelacanth Says:

      Really? Perhaps you might want to tuck your outrage back into your pants and read this. If this fake male genitals in plastic can not be named a “dildo”, then how then do you explain this advertisement for the same product?

      From “Love Honey” comes

      “Limpy 4 Inch Soft Packing Dildo
      If you crave a realistic bulge under your clothes, this small packing dildo is perfect for you. Super-realistic with a lifelike head and testicles, the floppy packing dildo adds realism to your play by perfectly representing a flaccid penis.
      Only: £11.99”

      http://www.lovehoney.co.uk/product.cfm?p=17641

      btw, I found Limpy in 2 seconds by googling “small dildos”.

      and ps, I am a gay man and have known many other gay men over the decades who owned every possible form of dildo and the tiny one is often used like a butt plug when depth is not desired — sorry for the TMI but it is required here to prove that the semantic quibbles over the naming of this thing as a dildo are attempts to divert from the topic at hand — a tactic Trans uses when screaming Die Cis Scum is not working. Nice try. “David”, but no cigar this time.

    • Jummy Says:

      I get where Dave is coming from. The transgenderists have captured the loyalties of mainstream, legacy media outlets. USAToday has a human interest story per week about some twelve or six year-old’s “heroic journey” with their heroically supportive parents. Voices critical of transgender ideolgy have no media profile whatsoever. We are in conflict with the hegemon here.

      Is it a wild exaggeration to describe these items as ‘dildos’? Perhaps not. But the hegemon could characterize it that way. The hegemon might prefer to characterize these things as ‘medical devices’ and then the first narrative that hits the presses would be “transphobic bloggers claim doctors are prescribing ‘dildos’ to youths undergoing gender transition”

      It’s all creepy enough. The term ‘teenybopper packer’ is creepy enough and it has the advantage of being their term. Use that. Put it in sneer-quotes. Talk about it being manufactured alongside dildos and marketed alongside sex toys, certainly. But calling it a dildo entails rhetorical disadvantages.

  93. Olivia Says:

    This just made me vomit in my mouth. This is what is wrong with humanity. I am not against the LBGT community, however this is absolutely ridiculous. Parent should not be buying this for the CHILDREN. As young as 5… Are you serious right now? This should be shut down. Like now.

  94. prozac Says:

    Love that the sidebar says “grooming products – by orange fuzz”

    NO SHIT!

    The more I look at these things, the more aghast I am at how ridiculously oversized they are. Three inches long and hanging directly down your inseam… That is nothing like male biology.

    Then I think about it and I wonder, is the purpose to try to totally fool the other kids? I.e. Being totally stealth? So no one knows you are trans? How mentally healthy can it be for a child to have their healthy biological reality be their darkest, most shameful secret? how embarrassing would it be if your obviously fake, wrongly positioned and oversize for your frame falls out or otherwise is noticed? (Hanging out your pant leg, lol) That’s the kind of thing that could destroy someone, anyone. If the other kids know you are trans, wouldn’t this make it weirder??

    Wouldn’t it be better to just sit down in a stall to pee and if anyone asks just say you don’t like splashing yourself or whatever??

    Look at the mannequin! Those look like adult size boxer briefs on a child mannequin with an adult erection.

  95. Kay Says:

    I think this is cute. If your kid wants to be a boy so bad they can feel a little closer to it before they are old enough… And if it is “just a phase” or a “misunderstanding” this would help them realise it.
    I dont understand how you haters can call yourselves “supportive” then go on to say this is a bad idea… Kids struggle with identity, parents struggle understanding how to cope with it or even if their kid is being serious… This is a short term solution NOT “pedo grooming”

    • Ashland Avenue Says:

      Where the hell did you get the idea that we’re “supportive” of the tranny bullshit?! And “cute”?! You’re a sick, sick man, “Kay”.

    • gchild Says:

      Kay,

      “…kids struggle with identity”

      “Packers” tell them that they will NEVER be able to be comfortable in their own skin. That they must HIDE their sex organs because they are WRONG. That the must EXPOSE fake ones in order to feel/be right. These “packers” aren’t self soothing, they are not theraputic for the child’s own mental health. They are meant to be SEEN dammit! By other people! Otherwise, there would be no need for them to bulge. And lets just stop with the desperate lie that they must pee standing up. Its embarrassing. These kids are saying what trans propaganda has taught them. These parents are desperate to defend what is essentially their own hoplessness and sense of failure because they arent being given other choices. Speaking of:

      “Parents struggle with how to cope…”

      If this is the best you have to offer, then you and everyone who supports this have failed them. So back away from the children. Even if you think there isnt anything better out there, do no more harm!

      Also, if you think packers that look like miniature adult penises are “cute”, then you have no regard or respect for a child’s dignity and bodily integrity.


    • Yep! Nothig pedo about letting children wear silicone dicks made by sex toy factories.

      A little girl with penis and testicles of the size of an adult man. How cute!

      *vomits everywhere*

    • prozac Says:

      Nothing resembling adult male genitalia has any business near an innocent child, PERIOD. You PROTECT them from that, not shove it down their pants.

    • moss Says:

      Before they are old enough for what? To have a meat-tube made out of arm skin sewn on to their pubic area?
      Or just to wear larger rubber phalluses? Or just old enough to take off-label testosterone so they can bravely grow body and facial hair and fool people that way?

    • morag99 Says:

      “I think this is cute.”

      Of course you do, Kay. We can only hope that you haven’t yet acted, or that you’re caught very, very soon.

      Gallus, I want to say that, disturbing and upsetting as it is to read comments like Kay’s, I think many of us regular commenters are very glad that you are letting them through.

      They are evidence, in black and white, of how predators and many trans allies speak so freely and casually about sexualizing and abusing children, stupidly believing that they are well-covered, so the true meaning of their words will fly under the radar. How they speak about children (girls as young as four) as capable of making very adult, sexual choices.

      These comments are evidence of how pedophiles and their apologists frame their own proclivities as a matter of children’s autonomy, rights and identities. “Gender identity” is just yet another way for predators and child abusers to frame their perversity as wholesome and innocent. i.e, “gender identity is completely separate … it has nothing to do with sexuality! I’m only trying to help the child with her struggles, and to protect her from harm!”

      • Kay Says:

        Im not a pedophile! Jesus fucking christ. Im a 19 yo female in a committed and loving hetrosexual relationship. Nothing about that sounds like im coming to rape your kids so honestly stop victimizing anyone with an opinion that differs from your own. I used the word “cute” to explain the idea. The idea that kids can be kids. Boys or girls. Girls that want to be boys or vis versa. I think the fact that everyone has perverted this so majorly is disgusting. Just cause your daughter wants to be your son doesnt mean that suddenly the fake dick will make predetors chase them… Honestly… Its just about making the kids feel a little closer to what they want to be until they are old enough to truely commit to surgery -IF thats what they decide to do

  96. julie Says:

    This is so inappropriate for children to be using and it isn’t necessary

  97. overwhelmed Says:

    The following comment, made by “fightingunreality,” came from 4thWaveNow’s blog post of the same subject. I thought it was very powerful, very convincing, and deserved to have a wider audience:

    As someone who was, as a child, what is now pathologized as ‘gender dysphoric’ and ‘dysmorphic,’ I am not capable of expressing the disgust that I experience when I am forced to acknowledge that the psychiatric community consents- be it tacitly or overtly- to the procurement by parents of artificial penises for adolescents, let alone pre-pubescent girls. It’s as if they- the professionals- have absolutely no awareness of the mountains of research regarding child cognitive development or the manner in which children learn sex roles within the society which imposes them.

    Although it’s embarrassing to detail, when I was a little girl and throughout adolescence, I hated myself, my sexed body. I had depression, suicidal ideation- that which has become the familiar narrative (aside from the fact that I now attribute my dysmorphia to the depression, not the other way around). There is virtually nothing that I have yet heard current ‘gender dysphoric’ girls or adolescents or Women say that is any different from the behaviors and beliefs that I held to at that time, and I can say with certainty that if I had been offered the chance to stuff my jeans with a realistic packer or STP, I would have leapt at the chance- especially if it would have been condoned by adults and/or other children. You see, I thought there was something wrong with me, and if my parents would have gone along with what I believed, they would have been agreeing with that assessment. She’s really a boy. There is something missing that we can simulate. She has a medical problem that we can fix.

    With such an understanding- this verification of wrongness- how exactly is it that the child that I was would have a desire, let alone need, to accept her female body and integrate it with self? Given the discomfort that I already had, and as an adult with an understanding of brain plasticity, I know that my obsessive visualization of parts which were not actually there would have been exacerbated by such artifice and would have created an even greater disconnect with my body that was. Dysmorphia would have been worsened. I have no doubt.

    These girls, these children, are being denied the opportunity that I had to actually find out who they really are. They will never know what it is like to live or love in their natal bodies without paraphernalia, surgery and exogenous hormone injections. They will not be able to acknowledge what it means to truly be female or have the chance to realize, with maturity, that there was never really anything wrong with them in the first place- that they were adapting to an environment hostile to females. They will never have that choice.

    The chance to integrate their beliefs, their personalities, their likes and dislikes with the condition of being female is being stolen from them by a psychiatric community- and what has become an entire gender industry spawned from it- which profits from their distress: an industry that is selling them unrealistic beliefs based on the immature fantasies of children. Their fertility, their healthy bodies, are being sacrificed to a culture that tells them that they are wrong for expressing their natural abilities and preferences and makes them hate themselves for being themselves.

    It stuns me, when I see such grotesque examples as is noted in this post, to realize how pathetic we have become as a culture that can actually embrace and promote the practice of providing artificial genitals for our children- a society that does not retch at the thought of so sexualizing a child. I wonder and I worry and I fight to try and draw attention to the fact that it is not our children who need to be altered, but instead, this culture of ours that is truly making us all sick.

  98. Fought for you Says:

    Anyone who defends this crap is sick and needs to be slapped upside the head

  99. Jeudi Says:

    I’ve always looked at the trans cult as an opening act for pedophilia. So, I am not surprised.

  100. Jummy Says:

    Would you like to purchase a dildo for your child for only $19.99 (plus s&h)?

    No? Hold the line please while we transfer this call to DCFS so your child can be relocated to a safe environment.

    • Siobhan Says:

      This is from the description of the Masho on that queencat site: “… keep it on your desk and touch its shaft and balls all you want, whenever you want. It is soft, cute, and feels very good to the touch.”

      This is porn. This is a sex toy.

      I put the image below but I’m not sure if this will work.

  101. Tiff is a stupid weirdo Says:

    I don’t know how this come a across as anti-girl or misogynistic. It is a cheap fake penis for young trans boys. It’s not a dildo, and you’re stupid if you think it is. It’s not shaming men when we allow trans girls to stuff their bras with silicon breast inserts and tuck their penises. If you don’t support trans girls either, then I won’t even bother debating any further. I believe most of you are just against transgender pre-teens and teens. But go ahead and force your child into dysphoria during a time period that is already rough on kids. Maybe when your trans child kills him- or herself, you might change your thinking.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: