Arrest warrant issued for Transwoman in Montreal “sex change” clinic Arson

May 21, 2016

Suspect Jayne Ellen Heideck

Suspect Jayne Ellen Heideck [facebook]

Police have issued an arrest warrant for a suspect in the arson attack on Dr. Pierre Brassard’s cosmetic surgery clinic. Brassard is the only surgeon in Canada who will perform the radical genital surgeries desired by some transgender people who believe the procedures will ease their dysphoria caused by wishing they had reproductive systems of the opposite sex. The men who keep Brassard in business call themselves “Brassard Beauties”. These complex surgeries have a high rate of complications, both acute and chronic, even in the best case scenario. For example, the majority of males who undergo “gender affirming” genital surgery will go on to experience chronic urinary tract infections for the rest of their lives.

On May 2nd a man carrying a machete, an ax, and a gas can entered the side door of the clinic after hours. He was witnessed by a worker who assumed he was a fellow employee who’d gotten locked out by the back dumpsters. The man rushed past him into the operating theatre and ignited the incendiary, which set off the sprinkler system, damaging clinic equipment and supplies. He left the premises before the fire department arrived. Personnel who remained in the building evacuated and no one was harmed. Over $700,000. in damage was caused, and surgeries were cancelled for two days until an alternate temporary facility was arranged. [1]

The transgender community described the incident as an “act of terror” against transgenders [2], likened to attacks by men on women’s reproductive health providers [1], and called for hate crime charges to be brought against the perpetrator. Egale, the Canadian Human Rights Trust, stated:

“On May 2nd, 2016, a man armed with a machete, axe, and gas can, stormed Canada’s only sex reassignment clinic in Montréal, and set it on fire.

This act of arson is a symbolic affront to Canada’s trans community, and nothing short of hate crime. The attack underlines the threat of violence that is endured by Canadian trans people on a daily basis, and affirms the continued need for positive change in our country’s public perception of trans people.” [3]

The suspect sought by police is Jayne Hellen Heideck, 42, of British Columbia, a transwoman and apparent [4] ex-patient of Brassard’s. He is charged with breaking and entering, arson by negligence, arson with disregard for human life, among other charges.

While the transgender community decried the lack of outrage that the “hate crime” received in the mainstream press and blogosphere, common sense led most sites, including this one, to suspect the perpetrator may be a member of the transgender community itself.

In 2012 transgender activists attempted to fire bomb a Wells Fargo bank in Portland. [5]

In 2012 transgender activists shut down the University of Pittsburgh repeatedly via bomb threats scrawled on bathroom walls and sent over the internet. [6]

In 2012 a transgender activist threatened to firebomb the feminist London Radfem 2012 conference. [5]

In 2015 a transwoman was convicted in an arson attack on the San Francisco home of facial feminization surgeon Doug Ousterhout. [7]

In 2015 Stacie Laughton, first elected openly transgender state representative, was arrested for threatening to firebomb a hospital. [8]

Last month, a transwoman confessed to an arson attack on the Gay Pride flag at the University of British Columbia. [9]

Brassard's clinic

Brassard’s clinic










129 Responses to “Arrest warrant issued for Transwoman in Montreal “sex change” clinic Arson”

  1. donesoverydone Says:

    Reblogged this on Ban Rapists & Violent Predators from Changing Legal Gender & Name and commented:
    For few more cases of transwomen arrested for bomb threats and bombings see “bomb” category on this page

    • GallusMag Says:

      There were two transwomen arson cases in the UK this year as well. If memory serves, one was arrested for setting 8 or 9 fires in one night, the other was a convicted sex offender who set fire to the trash bins behind an elementary school in a bid to go back to prison “as a woman”.

    • Zemskull Says:

      This Heideck person is only 42 and spent all that money to look like a pretty woman? He reminds me of the retired pro wrestler Jerry Lawler, who is 66 and and took some serious smacks to his face during his long career.

      • Zemskull Says:

        Wait, why did I not think of this before? I’ve been clamoring for some hGH but I can’t afford the $1K monthly price. I want the body and energy I had when I was 22. I’ll just tell my insurance company that I identify as a WWE superstar and I’ll be shooting that stuff up on their dime by next week. Hey, that genius Suzanne Sommers swears by hGH. What can possibly go wrong?

  2. Ashland Avenue Says:

    There’s another great shot of his mug here, wearing (I kid you not) a Viking helmet, cuz he’s a warrior!:

    I’m looking forward to the sound of crickets as the SJW and funfem sites update this story. (They won’t, of course, as it doesn’t fit the tranny oppression narrative.)

    Thanks for following up on this, Gallus.

    • prozac Says:

      The title of that article is “Insatisfaite de son changement de sexe, elle aurait incendié la clinique”. Now, my French is admittedly rusty but isn’t the female possessive “sa” not “son”? Tabernac!

      • Oak and Ash Says:

        “Now, my French is admittedly rusty but isn’t the female possessive “sa” not “son”?”

        Yes, but French nouns get touchy about being misgendered, and “changement” identifies as masculine.

      • In French the possessive pronoun agrees with the noun it’s describing. “Changement” is a masculine noun so the pronoun is masculine.

      • storyending Says:

        French possessives are about the object being modified, not the person doing the possessing (i.e., regardless of whether it is a mentally ill man who wears lady-face or a bona fide XY woman). In this case, changement is a ‘masculine’ word, so ‘son’ must take the masculine form.

      • lovetruthcourage Says:

        bona fide XX woman.

      • kesher Says:

        They called him “elle”, so they were gendering him as he demands.

      • petuniacat00 Says:

        Thanks to the above French speakers, rusty or not. What struck me about that is the trans en Francais will have so much less to complain about! 😯

        Oh no the poor dears will come up against the French Academy language thing. That’s always trying to root English words out of French. 🤔 Hmmm, the trans may have finally met their match there. Maybe French Language Snobbery Will Save the Day! 🇫🇷

      • prozac Says:

        Thanks for the clarification, all! Seems my French is more than a little rusty. I can remember most words but the grammar is gone.

      • Bea Says:

        “Bona fide XY woman”?

        Women don’t have Y chromosomes.

      • Janetwo Says:

        The femelle possessive is indeed sa, but in this case it accords itself with the word changement which is masculine.

    • ImNoCissie Says:

      Quote from that article, translated:

      I” it was impossible to accurately know whether Ms. Heideck has undergone surgery to become a man or vice versa.
      However, the authorities assured to be “looking for a woman.””

      Lol…is Quebec not on board with walking on eggshells for the sake of political correctness

      • prozac Says:

        AND they used the term “sex change”! Will the violence never end?

      • Ben X Says:

        The answer is no. Members of the queer/trans subculture act like it’s universal, but they tend to be oblivious to the fact that it’s very Anglo. That is, American, British, Australian, etc. It’s slowly penetrating other languages and cultures, of course, but it takes time. So it’s normal that a French-language article, even from Canada, would say something like that about surgery. Even facebook still has only two sexes if you use it in other languages!

    • Em Says:

      A Valkyrie, no doubt.

  3. prozac Says:

    Holy shit. Just read about this and clicked on over to you and bam! You were already on it. This line really stood out to me:

    “On May 2nd a man carrying a machete, an ax, and a gas can entered the side door of the clinic after hours. He was witnessed by a worker who assumed he was a fellow employee who’d gotten locked out by the back dumpsters.”

    A machete, ax, and gas can? Probably just a fellow employee! Gender confirmation surgery is perfectly normal, and totally safe.

    Also, Heideck is an unfortunately apt last name for this fellow. Well, maybe not anymore…

    • GallusMag Says:

      Because the serial killer? I thought of Heidnik when I read his name too.

      • prozac Says:

        Heh, on a slightly more low brow level, it reads as hey,dick! to me. At least I imagine he would have heard that A LOT as a child.

    • Bob Doublin Says:

      Hahaha,what do you mean Prozac? EVERYbodyknows those are required accessories for the well dressed “WOMAN”. The sole appropriate question allowed is whether they match her purse or shoes.

    • lovetruthcourage Says:

      Yeah, that is just incredible. Why would a fellow employee be carrying a machete, ax and gas can? I imagine this small clinic only has a dozen or so employees, so anyone working there would have at least passing familiarity with the other people working there. It is not like this is a huge corporation with tens of thousands of employees. The idea that anyone would think this was a fellow employee is totally disingenuous. I wonder if the person making that disingenuous claim was in on it?

    • DoubleXMarksTheSpot Says:

      More appropriately it would be Beidick, no?

      BTW, if you go on the CBC story here:

      I initially reported erroneously over at Reddit that the CBC judiciously avoided any gendered references to the suspect, and speculated that they’d gotten blowback from people objecting to male violent offenders referred to as women. As the national broadcaster, the CBC is supposed to take a neutral stance on all things (though in reality they have a left of centre bias, much like PBS). Anyway, the caption below the photo of the clinic refers to a “woman” being wanted. If you go to the bottom of the story, you can click on “Report typos.” A couple of us from Reddit have already reported this typo.

      That’s interesting, how the francophone press have no problem saying “sex change operation” and other such terminology that would be strictly verbotten in the English language media. As an anglo from Toronto, I had no idea the trans thing was a largely anglo phenomenon. The American influence on anglo culture in Canada would have much to do with that, I’d wager.

  4. Guls Says:

    No wonder the threat, ‘Die In A Fire’ has become synonymous with online Transactivism….

  5. anywoman2 Says:

    Reblogged this on anywomans humanity.

  6. GallusMag Says:

    Media reporting arson suspect as female:

    • cerulean blue Says:

      It’s interesting how much reading between the lines one has to do while reading that article. Yes, it was a “woman” who set the fire, and no we won’t share “her” picture (because that would be to big a hint about what “she” really is). Nor can the police state the motive for the attack. Nor can we, as reporters, actually do our job and share what type of surgery this “woman” might have had that would cause “her” to set a fire that caused so much damage that we were calling it a hate crime up until five minutes ago. That hate crime classification has somehow mysteriously changed, but we as reporters won’t be offering any clarification on that. You see, there is no free speech in Canada.

      • red Says:

        Nor can we comment. Anywhere.

      • lovetruthcourage Says:

        Yes, news sources need persistent correction. Born male? Then one remains male, even if appearance changes. I will continue to write the editors of articles like these and complain about this mis-sexing of people. The appearance of a thing, is not the thing.

      • lr1290 Says:

        Exactly. The article has a button where you can supposedly comment but it doesn’t work at all when you click it. Obviously not a coincidence.

    • Sarah Says:

      ‘The only surgeon in Canada who will perform radical genital surgeries’.
      None of the rest of them will do it, not because it’s harmful (when has that ever stopped a doctor?), but because they know that their unstable violent male patients will come after them if they cut their dicks and testicles off.

      They know these men are dangerous and violent, they’re gambling that it will be someone else who ends up as the target.

  7. carterabbie Says:

    The money in this gender-shit must be really good. You couldn’t pay me to provide services to them, I’d be terrified. The only person attacking those who do are the trans themselves. You’d think that alone would make people buy a clue, but I guess not.

  8. Medi Says:

    Wow the Die in a Fire male to trans threats against radical feminists isn’t so out there after all. Arson is a typical crime of white males, there are very very very few women arsonists. So every time you read a headline about a “woman” arsonist, think twice he’s probably trans. The doctors under attack by their own patients? Do women ever do this to doctors? Sheesh, thanks for reporting this. Because everywhere else out there, it is reported that male to trans NEVER hurt anyone and anything they are so special peaceful perfect doncha know.

    • carterabbie Says:

      Arson is also connected with sexual paraphilias. Quelle surprise anyone?

      • juno Says:

        Yes it is, and not too surprising. I read a clinical book a few years ago that chronicled several known serial killers from a very professional standpoint. There were three ‘tells’ that seem to keep popping up in these accounts of AGP’s: Arson, bedwetting, sadism towards animals, females and other ‘lesser’ beings.

        Maybe these guys aren’t serial murderers, but they are likely on the same continuum. Sobering to think about, even though it makes the DIAF comments more understandable.

      • K.Jane Says:

        I read that arson is linked to rape too. Can’t say I’m surprised by this.

        Yet another example of why it’s important to know the sex of the perpetrator.

        Whenever you see a news story about a woman doing something really weird or committing a crime that women don’t often commit, check again because it might be a female impersonator, especially if there’s no picture!

      • sellmaeth Says:

        Why arson? I mean, logically, all crimes would be connected with rape and serial murderers, but I am really puzzled as to why they have this obsession with fire.

    • Oak and Ash Says:

      “Do women ever do this to doctors?”

      Not even when they deserve it!

  9. rheapdx1 Says:

    @GallusMag…..You, me and others called this one on the head. The fact the perp was an ex-patient does not surprise. After all….if one cannot via an elective procedure get that psycho-look replaced with one that will hide their true intent, what else is there to do? Burn the place down…..and try to make it look like it was the evil, far right that did it.

    Let me raise the bet from earlier on this: throw in paying for the season tickets for (when) the Montreal Expos come back (via MLB expansion), in addition to the previous offer that this will be swept under the radar by the ‘t’ contingent online. Or even minimalized. After all…[SIC]…’this does not happen. We are not violent. It is those who hate who are’.

    If there has ever been a good case to back what has been said by those out of Hopkins, et al…that there has been better than ample reason to stop the treatments, due to instability….this is it.

    • Zemskull Says:

      Nothing would have made this man look completely sane, but a little Botox on the forehead and between the eyebrows would have greatly reduced the macho-ragey look. Strange that he apparently spent a lot of money (or taxpayer money) on several elective cosmetic procedures, but neglected to avail himself of one that’s relatively inexpensive in relation to its cosmetic efficacy.

      • lovetruthcourage Says:

        Botox? That would only translate to a stunned, stuck face, ragey, macho look instead of a ragey, macho look. Besides, what good is Botox when you have male-pattern baldness? He could get a dime-store wig for less money than Botox. He could get one of those hair transplant procedures if going upscale. (Do those actually work?) Ah, no. Just as well that he saved his money. Men do not look like women. Nature wins!

      • Zemskull Says:

        Hi lovetruthcourage: A skilled cosmetic doctor or RN using conservative quantities of the ‘tox will produce a relaxed, smooth look. I agree with you that Heideck’s male pattern baldness would be somewhat mismatched with a smooth forehead. If by going upscale on the hair replacement, you mean a hair transplant, Heideck would be looking at $20K to solve his five-head. The problem with hair replacement is that it can involve digging out one’s own hair from the back of the neck to transfer to the forehead. (Yes, this hurts.) MTTs tend to want to grow long, thick hair, so yanking out hair from the backside isn’t the best idea. So, yes, on the hair point, you’re correct that Mother Nature laughs at the MTT.

      • Zemskull Says:

        PS: In terms of saving his money, it’s probably the Canadian government that’s paying for facial feminizing procedures. Ditto with the US Veteran’s Administration in the US. Your money at work!

  10. dejavublonde Says:

    Gosh, I wonder why all the original news reports reported definitively that a man was seen going in with an ax etc? The people that work there can’t even tell the difference between a man and a trans. Could it be because there is no difference?

  11. Oak and Ash Says:

    Maybe the supposed lack of documented crimes by transwomen cited by transactivists in support of allowing them access to women’s spaces is partly an artefact of how the crimes are being reported. I tried googling the names of some crimes–arson, sexual assault, murder, etc.–with “transwoman” and found that news sources are not in the least reluctant to describe the victim of a crime as trans, yet, as we’ve seen, when transwomen are perpetrators, they tend to be identified as women (or sometimes men pretending to be transwomen, such as Christopher Hambrook).

    Commenters here have often mentioned the scrubbing of comments that offer rational arguments against the trans agenda on mainstream news sites (most recently on the appalling op-ed in the Charlotte Observer). It really looks as if the liberal media are working overtime to shape a narrative which portrays transwomen as innocent victims and all those who oppose men in women’s private spaces as irrational bigots.

  12. Mom in Eugene Says:

    You just can’t win with them- disagree, get death threats, do what they want, and they may assault or set your place on fire.
    And these are the men Obama wants in women’s private spaces.

    • Dogtowner Says:

      Obama, Democracy Now!, Counterpunch, FAIR, and I would assume all the liberal media in general.

  13. Livvie Says:

    Because this person isn’t mentally ill, or violent, or anything. He just wants to be a *girl*. Really, really badly. And heaven help you if you don’t do what this piece of garbage wants yesterday, because he’ll burn your place of work to the ground, or maybe just your home; harass your family, or come after you.

    What a joke. A very, very ugly joke. He looks like someone who gets his jollies torturing small animals as well as setting fires. If he wets the bed, we have the trifecta!

    Where are all the trannies who should be here, defending this piece of garbage and whining about how tragic his tale is? Fucking ridiculous.

    • rheapdx1 Says:

      The answer is ‘NOWHERE’. Cannot be found, split for parts unknown, caught the last bus or train out of Dodge.

      Speaking of this and the connected censorship…if one were to look in the usual places online, there is no mention of the arrest warrant. None about this having been done by someone in the community. But still more of the usual manure and sewage.

      By the way…add to the other indicators of one being a creep, the use of some medical devices for one’s carnal enjoyment. A while back….someone I used to be friends with mentioned using a ‘tens’ (hope I used the right version of the name) device for a thrill. Yep, the one that when properly used, measures the respone times of the nerves….arms, shoulder, determine if there is any damage and therapies after. (I was tested with this by one of my docs, due to a potential ‘dead arm’ issue on the left side). But among some of the ‘t’ folks, it seems to be for shocking and some type of sick release. This was one of the reasons why I no longer talk to the person…and similar others who are a yad on the creepy side.

      And yet….and yet….the mindset that is that creepy…or commits arson…is deep into censorship…or threatens others who have not been consumed by the cult…is to be ‘welcomed’. Coddled and enabled, at the expense and safety of others who have not elected to be scum. Real nice world we have here……

  14. kesher Says:

    Heideck: “What do you mean I’m still an ugly man? Transitioning was supposed to turn me into a beautiful butterfly!”

  15. charlston Says:

    Dissatisfied? This is not the first time a doctor has been punished for not delivering the fantasy result someone was after. Doctors can only do so much with what nature gave us. Some regret does come from a patient’s expectations not being grounded in reality. This is worth repeating.
    By Stella Morabito.
    NOVEMBER 11, 2014

    The above article was referencing this now archived Au site- Gender Menders.
    … ”After discovering that the removal of their sexual organs did nothing to address their gender confusion, these patients now have no way back to their former selves….”

    • petuniacat00 Says:

      That Federalist article that Charlston links to above is fantastic! She goes through and describes the suppression of information about transition regret and detransition. And then she has a bunch of quotes from regretters.

      There’s a Swedish documentary CALLED ‘Regetters’! One guy says if the surgeon had asked him just before doing the penis removal “are you sure you want this?” he would’ve said “no”. Several express shock at looking at their body after their penis was removed. Holy crap. The stuff should absolutely NOT be being allowed. Straight up of medical ethics.

    • lovetruthcourage Says:

      You are right, because the problem isn’t located in any part of the body, other than the brain.

  16. Artemis Jade Says:

    I’d love to hear from Heideck what exactly his complaint was. Yes I know he’s mentally unbalanced and his reasons might not be logical but I’d still like to hear why he’s mad at the clinic that apparently inverted his penis. It’s a lot of work to maintain a neo-vagina—was he not made fully aware of that? Did he expect his life to change in terms of how people treat him?

    Just like that guy in San Francisco who tried to burn down the house of the surgeon who did his FFS—what was his complaint? Here’s a follow-up article on him and yes he thinks the surgeon didn’t do a good job. But judging by the 2 photos provided, I’d say his surgeon did a pretty fair job.

    • rheapdx1 Says:

      The perp had to be made aware of what the work/maintenance that needs to be done, to keep the created cavity open. Hell, if one looks online…some of these surgeons put the instructions in text or pdf form. So there is no excuse for some unstable person to think this is a ‘set and forget’ elective.

      If one thinks it is, nature and genetics (there goes that pesky nemesis of the cult…that being SCIENCE) have a nasty surprise in store. The body will fight this continuously…and even if one gets to not having to work on the cavity as often as they had after the op…they still have to. No magic can change that (let alone the other items associated with the neo-vaginal canal..which out of decency, will not be repeated).

      As for those dissatisfied with the facial reconstruction/’feminization surgery’…if one had it done and they do not have the image of a serial killer, mixed with that from the movie ‘Brazil’….call lt a WIN. The person is ahead of the game…call it s day until the touchups are needed.

      @GallusMag…In looking at the pics, while not being crude to the person in question…anyone going through this will find out, soon enough the body will even fight what has been done. Crazy little chemicals, that DNA. And if they try to have it done again….yeah those crazy bogeymen of DNA and gravity will be present.

    • petuniacat00 Says:

      I read that article. The surgeon who’s house was torched and the surgeon he sold his practice to agreed to do remedial surgery on his chin involving an the implant. The implant might not of been for the chin. Which suggests that even by the standards of the cosmetic surgeons the outcome was pretty poor. Versus the fantasy standards of ‘I will suddenly look like a woman on a magazine cover’. More like an outcome that’s lumpy, and asymmetrical.

      Which just goes to show that when you’re dealing with these cosmetic surgeons who are blowing basic medical ethics to the wind maybe they’re not very good surgeons. Just even for regular cosmetic surgery. As well as being willing to take on cases where what the patient is actually seeking is impossible.

      Trans, it’s a subculture, including black-market hormones, riddled with the willingness to do reckless and dangerous things with your body.

      • carterabbie Says:

        I’m not sure why, but it seems that plastic surgery on men generally ends up pretty badly. I mean, women look bad, too, but on men things seem to go sideways fairly often. Even men who have tons of money can still wind up looking weird and freakish. I’m thinking of men like Mickey Rourke, Kenny Rodgers and yeah, Bruce Jenner.

        Factor in also that white men tend to not age very well and yeah, you end up with a bloody mess.

      • lovetruthcourage Says:

        I think it is a bit racist to say categorically that “white men don’t age well.” Many do, but they are the ones who take care of themselves. The same could be said of all men and women, of any race. It takes effort.

      • GallusMag Says:

        LMAO that’s not “reverse-racist”. Blacks don’t crack! The whiter the skin the more wrinkling. Is it a full moon today or some shit?

      • lovetruthcourage Says:

        Even though I have European, Asian and African ancestry, my skin is lily white. I am lighter than the average Scandinavian. Guess what? ZERO wrinkles! (I am in my mid-40s.) Some may say I just have good genes, and maybe I do, but I also take care of myself inside and out. I eat healthy foods, exercise, and take care of my skin. Lifestyle has a lot to do with how well we age.

      • GallusMag Says:

        Must be your blackness!

      • lovetruthcourage Says:

        Yeah, must be my “blackness!” Even though my African ancestors were North African Arabs (from Morocco / Algeria and also Egypt), not “blacks”, according to my ancestry DNA test. Kind of hard to argue with a DNA test. 😉

      • Dogtowner Says:

        If one doesn’t believe that white men don’t age well, one needs to open one’s eyes. I read someone saying that testosterone is toxic to the body, and my thought was that perhaps it’s not the testosterone itself, but how it metabolizes. If one’s diet and supplementation is not optimal — and how many people’s are? —
        decades of the body having to process testosterone takes its toll. As I’ve aged I’ve really noticed how UGLY most men are, especially middle-aged and beyond. The worst-looking women — often heavy smokers and drinkers — end up looking like men.

      • GallusMag Says:

        Unless they’re black. Then they still look fabulous! Damn Black Privilege!

      • carterabbie Says:

        Naw, I’m standing by this one. White men in general age in dog years. Even the ones with money and presumably plenty of opportunity to invest in their looks. Compare and contrast say, Sidney Poitier and Michael Douglas. Poitier is nearly 20 years older and looks at least 20 years younger and Douglas has definitely had “work” done.

      • rheapdx1 Says:

        Something that needs to be brought into this debate is that aging badly/poorly happens to all groups on the planet. That little bug called biology, as well as it’s relative science see to this.

        With that said, @dogtowner is right. People who did not take care of themselves early in life, end up with the results of that in the face, as well as other parts of the body. Some may see those as life battle scars earned…in other cases, it is those who just did not give a damn. Black, white….every stripe… happens. With things like vaping, as well as the fed giving the all clear on some fats and the like, expect to see more of this, en masse.

        When it comes to those who are ‘t’…what one sees when one looks at one with a rough face, barring one read those articles (which are all over the place about skin care, including which foods will help or hinder same)…one can see the long term result of not just caring, but the body’s own fight with chemicals that were trying to overwrite the original genetics. We see this a lot with jocks who abuse steroids…and those were taken in the name of ‘performance’. Now imagine how serious the cellular and external level fight is…and that shows up on the face.

        By the way….and this is in the name of full disclosure…mid-50’s here. That is not to brag…far from it. Call what is going on ‘pure luck’….as well as due to multiple illnesses, being seen by a group of docs who give a rat’s *** about what is going on. And they…thank God…are not the ones who have bought into the cult, etc.

      • GallusMag Says:

        Well this was a fun derail. Back on topic now, thanks! 🙂

      • Most men, particularly white men, look like crap as they get older. There is always the big lie circulating men tend to look better as they get older, but women look like shit after they hit 50. It isn’t true at all, let me tell you, as anybody who has ever gone to 30th, 40th, 50th, and 60th high school reunions or have gone on the online dating sites looking for older guys can attest. Once these men, meaning white men mainly, hit 50, their looks go south. I think one of the biggest reasons they look like shit has to do with the fact many of these men have done physical labor for decades, and it ages the body something fierce. Smoking and drinking also take a toll. These men, especially once they hit 60, look like they are going to die. No thanks for me ever getting serious about one of those men. I don’t want to be a nurse for these near-corpses.

        As for the men trying to impersonate women, they never pass no matter how good an attempt a surgeon tries to alter their appearance. The bone structure of an adult man is not at all like a woman’s, nor is the muscle mass. These trans always have something off with their appearance. The fact most of these trans are great big guys to begin with makes it more obvious.

      • Zemskull Says:

        Hi carterabbie: I’ve known of white men in their 70s and even their 80s who try to pick up women half their age on and other sites. These old men always point to how “hot” Sean Connery is. Problem with that reasoning is: 1) These guys look nothing like Sean Connery, so how Connery looks in his old age is irrelevant, and 2) Sean Connery, at least in my opinion, isn’t hot, and was only halfway handsome in his 30s when he was James Bond. He didn’t age well.

    • Livvie Says:

      All that dilating and hairball removal was probably too much for the poor dear.

  17. Rosemary Says:

    @rohemoog @mslauralipstick @SusanGapka @HeyWriterGrrl It could have been committed by trans person, too, pissed off with results of surgery— Jillian Page (@JillianPage1) May 8, 2016


    @JillianPage1 @rohemoog @mslauralipstick @SusanGapka @HeyWriterGrrl studies have found very few ppl regret having it done tho. Facts needed.— HipGnosis (@HipGnosis23) May 21, 2016


  18. red Says:

    I won’t dignify what they are doing by calling them “activists”. That implies some righteousness to their acts. They’re just violent thugs.

    • rheapdx1 Says:

      And we are only 7 days away from that month, when most of these loonies will be placed on pedestals here in the US. Yep they will be upheld like ‘The Weathermen’ (pre-criminal actions) were. But there is a difference.

      The difference being that the SDS were doing what they did for a borderline eccumenical cause/causes. Not saying the people involved in this were ‘right’…it is that they thought this was for the ‘greater good’. They were not blowing up doctor’s offices, because someone was not happy with an elective opening that did not work..or were not properly screened for such a procedure.

      The same about a greater good can be said about The Black Panthers, etc (at least at their outset). But calling a bunch of spoiled, entitled, system gaming, crude, anti-female, fascist cretins ‘activists’ does a major disservice to the word…and is a mockery of what activism really does mean (as in the examples above…criminal actions by those mentioned taken out of the mix).

  19. […] via Arrest warrant issued for Transwoman in Montreal “sex change” clinic Arson — GenderTrender […]

  20. […] since trannies are known to be violent,  I will surmise that these unstable males are already beyond simple flashing.  They are […]

  21. Margie Says:

    Creepy AF. Canada should get agent Clarice Starling on the case.

    BTW, it goes without saying that this story was nowhere to be seen on “LGBT” blogs and new sites. When it comes to covering news about the “T,” these sites are about as reliable as the North Korean News Agency. None of them covered the Wells Fargo firebombing or the SF arson either. The Stacie Laughton bomb threat story was ignored and then grudgingly covered when Laughton admitted doing it.

  22. sellmaeth Says:

    Those gender-reassignment surgeons live a dangerous life. Probably that’s part of the reason why there are so few of them.

    “For example, the majority of males who undergo “gender affirming” genital surgery will go on to experience chronic urinary tract infections for the rest of their lives.”

    Well, doesn’t that just make them feel more “like women”?

    Compared to other possible results (like complications with the neovag) this seems pretty harmless.
    Granted, for women, chronic urinary tract infections are often a result of inadequate healthcare and could be prevented, but it is something that partly stems from female biology, i.e. short urethra.
    Closest thing to authentic female experience they’ll ever get.

    • cerulean blue Says:

      Please let’s stop calling it a neo-vagina, as it’s not a “new vagina” at all, as that name would have us believe. Let’s not allow trans, Inc to control the debate with their twisted terminology. Language matters, so let’s call it what it is. It’s a pseudovagina. A real vagina has multiple functions apart from sex, as any of as actual women know: it can stretch tremendously to allow the birth of a human, the revert to its previous size, it is self cleaning, and self lubricating, it allows passage of menstrual fluid. It is a complete organ, and part of an interacting system of organs that work together to form a reproductive system. What it is not is an inverted penis or penis-plus-fecal-coliform-bacteria-infected-segment of the large intestine crudely sewn together into a fuckhole-wound that must be forcibly kept open lest it scar itself shut. That’s a not an organ, that’s pseudovagina, a franken-imitation, something fake, something ersatz, nothing “neo” about it.

      • sellmaeth Says:

        Of course. You are totally right. Hm, Frankenvagina sounds cool. ^^

        However, now that I think about it, the term “vagina” is actually more fitting for this thing than it is for what actual women have – the word is derived from “sheath”, so, the thing you put a sword into.
        What actual women have leads somewhere – language should reflect that.

        But feminist reshaping of language won’t happen anytime soon … in the meantime, Frankenvag has a nice ring to it. ^^

      • carterabbie Says:

        I have to admit I find the term neo-vagina rather apt, but only because I associate it with the character from The Matrix. But yeah, pseudo is probably a better prefix.

      • cerulean blue Says:

        Depends on the venue, i think. If you want to mock them frankenvagina is great, because it describes metaphorically and insultingly what their flesh tube really is. But because of that it’s not going to fly with a lot of regular people who need convincing. Pseudovagina should resonate with anyone who stayed awake long enough in high school biology to learn a few prefixes, and it’s not insulting. It simply tells the truth in a scientific manner, in a way that neo-vagina intentionally does not.

      • “Pseudo” is better than “neo” because “pseudo” means something is fake or a sham. That is what these artificial vaginas are, and in fact perfectly describes transgenderism in a nutshell. A complete and total sham.

      • rheapdx1 Says:

        At the risk of making a bad joke…’frankenvagina’ give the impression that the creeps from ADM had created a new item to be sold at Kroger. Or scenes from ‘Young Frankenstein’ can come to mind😊

        I am amazed the cult has not forced school textbook to rewrite the biology books. But to do so would require, at the least some scientific (there is that term again..which is like ‘kryptonite’ when used) evidence brought that creating same on the operating table is the same as what is done by nature.

        And the insanity from the science-deprived does not stop here. There are those who are convinced that either via stem cells or transplant, MtF’s will be able to give birth in the future. Like bad science fiction brought to life. Makes one really wonder why with all of the children who have been born and are waiting to be adopted, or have good parents…why the vanity cases have not thought of fulfilling the need to be a parent that way. I think we all know the answer…but gee, bring that up otherwise…and saying it is a ‘hate crime’.

    • juno Says:

      Until they nearly die from lack of interest in said UTI and reactions due to having been given the cheapest drug on the rack with no interest shown in family history which would have shown this to be a bad idea and then accused of being a drug seeker when they show up at the ER curled into a ball and denied help for hours they still have not had the ‘authentic female experience’.

      • sellmaeth Says:

        … if that happened to them, I bet they’d call it “transphobia”.

        But it probably would not, since most trans are still very obviously male, and therefore given male privilege.

  23. Zemskull Says:

    Seriously, this contemporary transgender movement and its control of language have serious potential to severely hinder, to the point of ruining, police investigations and suspect captures. If law enforcement now has to be “transgender sensitive” and they can no longer put out an APB and/or a notice to the media that, for example, they are seeking a male suspect, valuable time and/or sightings will be wasted. This case was a serious crime with high-dollar damage, not to mention the potential for human death, particularly with the weaponry being carried. The last thing the police and/or media needs to be claiming at this point is that they’re looking for a woman.

    • carterabbie Says:

      The police might be calling him a “woman” in their official documents for public consumption, but you can best believe in their conversations they probably refer to him as a “tranny” or worse. I think the picture speaks for itself.

      • Zemskull Says:

        Hi carterabbie: I agree that we can assume that the police privately speak to each other in rougher terms than they do when on their public radio feed, which is also used by the media and the general public. The latter two entities are vital in helping solve crimes, and calling this suspect a woman greatly hinders that.

        Also, I believe it was Gallus who rightly pointed out in another topic that counting MTTs as women in crime statistics causes the US Department of Justice, and its equivalents in Canada and other countries, to incorrectly inflate the prevalence of female violent criminality.

      • charlston Says:

        If MTT are officially being called ‘Woman’ would it not be politically correct to call this offender (by their own definition) a non Cis Woman. Seeing as its hate speech, violent and staggeringly offensive to refer to a trans by the wrong pronoun or even to ask what pronoun they are?

        Which brings me to my other point.
        If MTT insist they be called women, say we are not allowed to make up labels for them and scream violence when misgendered, why is it ok to make up labels such as Cis and demand we use it when I am offended and traumatised by that label?
        Shouldn’t we be given the same equal playing field and cry violence when they put us in an oppressed, isolating sub group (Cis) of what is now know as ‘women’?

        I was just read some helpful tips on this site below and number 6 is worth the read for anyone who is an advocate. Of course we cannot ask if one is trans but we all could do with some practice of our ”knowing who they are, without being offensive” skills anyhoo.

        Aimee Toms are you listening?

        6. Be A Bathroom Escort.

        ”I just learned about this on twitter! If you are a cis woman, you can offer to be a bathroom escort for trans women who feel unsafe. This is probably most applicable in places with these heinous laws, but even in places without, this conversation is contributing to more vocal transphobia and I wouldn’t be surprised if trans women all over were feeling pretty unsafe right now.”

        A couple of links-
        ‘Every major mainstream newspaper organization has standards for reporting on transgender individuals – including the Associated Press Style Book, which is one of the main go-to sources for media organizations that don’t have their own:

        ”Use the pronoun preferred by the individuals who have acquired the physical characteristics of the opposite sex or present themselves in a way that does not correspond with their sex at birth. If that preference is not expressed, use the pronoun consistent with the way the individuals live publicly.”

        “Folks must unlearn the bias and discriminatory practices rooted in structural oppression,” Hunter explained. “Do their jobs without prejudice.”
        The next time you read about a transgender person, look at how they are described; pay attention to the pronouns and the name being used. If it’s wrong, send a letter to the editor, or contact the journalist directly. ”

      • Zemskull Says:

        I like non-cis-women. If MTTs are going to complicate the language, out-complicate them. Ditto with the pseuovagina idea.

  24. antigenderist Says:

    Hey Gallus,

    The NYT ran a sympathetic piece about “just wanting to pee” by a man who has been court ordered not to be around his own children and accused of raping his wife.

    • Zemskull Says:

      Maybe this Travis Lee Stroud “just wanted to pee” in women’s vaginas.

      Regarding trans suicide rates, we’re constantly told that trans people are going to kill themselves if they don’t get bathroom access. I’m surprised that there hasn’t been a statistical comparison of the suicide rates of rape victims. According to the National Violence Against Women Prevention Research Center at the Medical University of South Carolina, approximately 13 percent of rape victims attempt suicide. Sexual assault affects ~30 percent of girls and women, whereas trans people are only .3 percent of the entire population. In other words, what will happen to female suicide rates if rapey men are awaiting women in locker rooms, fitting stalls and bathrooms?

    • lovetruthcourage Says:

      I see that the NYT has closed comments on the article antigenderist posted and NYT scrubbed most critical comments. How fascist and Orwellian.

    • ImNoCissie Says:

      I hope Breitbart does pick that story up. Here’s an article about him in the local Chattanooga press before the family violence occurred:

    • Oak and Ash Says:

      According to the protection order, he threatened to kill himself if his wife reported the abuse against her and their child–a move straight out of the abuser’s playbook and what seems also to be a typical strategy for transwomen to get women to do what they want.

      When women threaten to kill themselves unless they’re given what they demand, they’re diagnosed with a personality disorder or mental illness. When men do it, the government changes the definitions of male and female.

      • rheapdx1 Says:

        Sadly, this goes along with the snowflakes acting as though any crime committed while said person is in transition, is to be excused. And I do mean any,from familial abuse to treason.

        Something else came to mind in reading this and the posts of women who had husbands who, on middle age decided to not get the Mustang and opted for Versace. That being…it seems that the males tend to see marriage as a cover…and after having gotten what they want, either abuse their spouse to a separation or worse, skip out (after ruining the finances as well) to live the fantasy with other like-minded persons. But the above is acceptable in the narrative, after long as the ‘true self’ is now at the fore…then the crap is good. Except for those who are on the business end of this crap.

        So one has to wonder if the waste of cells mentioned in the Times article will be the next lionized crook. If so…as @GallusMag has posted here, as have others….they will be part of a sad, long, sick litany.

      • charlston Says:

        Its true from my experience that all is forgiven when one is Trans. I have seen quite a few people let off the hook because of it. How many mental issues are tied back to ‘they were under severe strain due to their confused state of being’ with charges dropped or excuses made as they are now getting real help via gender affirmation hormones etc.

        My ex thought he was Jesus reincarnated at one point but it was dismissed as stress. If I said that I would be force fed antipsychotics and forcibly sent for observation They would class me as mentally unstable.
        Perhaps its me but I am seeing an obvious get out of jail free card especially when their past cannot be bought up under new rules.

        Surely mental health professionals should be looking into the correlation between antisocial behaviour such as pyromania, suicidal threats, psychosis, dysphoria, impulse control disorder or partner abuse and being Transgender.
        Any other group with behavioural disorders as part of their makeup would be classified as having mental health issues and treated accordingly regardless of what the patients say.

        Women were labeled hysterics not that long ago, mainly due to men controlling them, and treated as unstable if they objected. Some non-Cis women commit acts of violence or say the most outrageous things with no stigma at all. SMH Its still a mans world to some degree.

    • Ashland Avenue Says:

      Antigenderist, thanks for posting that. This guy Travis Lee Stroud makes me sick, and I’m really glad that his abusive tactics are now out there for the world to know. As recently as this past October, Stroud was legally required to have his father Thomas supervise his visits with his kid! But hey, what does it matter, Stroud’s his “true self” now, so apparently everyone’s just supposed to forget about that, right? Must be nice to have that kind of privilege.

      One small thing that leapt out at me from the article that ImNoCissie posted: “Russo says she (sic) is getting a $100,000 advance for the book, a number backed up by her (sic) editor at Flatiron who won’t give an exact number but says it’s six figures.”

      So this guy Travis is the one who blares out to everyone how much money he’s making. The publisher is a bit more discreet, so obviously this information came from Stroud. Who does that?! Who broadcasts their personal financial information like that? It’s the tranny arrogance, braggadocio, and narcissism at play again.

    • GallusMag Says:

      [Right Wing Site]

      “Travis Lee Stroud, aka “Meredith Russo,” apparently has never faced any criminal charges related to the allegations of abuse and sexual assault made in Jennifer Russo’s 2015 petition for a protection order. However, Stroud had been arrested in Hamilton County, Tennessee, in November 2014, on a charge of “interference with emergency calls.”

      • Ashland Avenue Says:

        Here’s something interesting from an interview with him:

        Which fictional character are you most like/ do you most closely identity with, and why? “Roxie Richter from Scott Pilgrim, because I am a very angry queer girl (who might also be from the moon) who likes to start fights with straight boys, and I’m definitely at least a couple of people’s ‘evil’ ex.”

        So he thinks someone having to get a restraining order against him is something to view with amusement, I guess. One other thing: I wonder what “interference with emergency calls” entails? Hmm…is it not letting someone (in his case, probably a woman) call 911 against you? Just a hunch…you know, a hunch from my lifetime of experience as a woman of reading about/hearing about/watching in so many goddamn movies and T.V. shows/WITNESSING male violence against women. Shit, if that’s the case here with Travis, he’s straight outta the abuser playbook, isn’t he?

      • Oak and Ash Says:

        By the way, his novel is about a brave, beautiful, intelligent blonde girl who transfers to a new high school and attracts the attention of one of the most popular boys. He’s honest and kind, but the girl wonders how he’d react if he found out her secret. It’s just like the plot of half the young adult novels out there already, except in this one the beautiful girl was born male. I’m sure we’re all shocked by that twist.

        I’d like to believe he’s exaggerating the advance, but the publishing industry is so insane they might well pay that much for this sort of narcissistic, pro-trans wish-fulfillment, provided it seems trendy enough to sell a lot of copies.

        If a woman writer were served with a restraining order under similar circumstances–child abuse and sexual assault!–does anyone believe so little would be written about it? Even the average male writer would receive less deference in the press.

      • Ashland Avenue Says:

        I saw that too, Oak and Ash! That novel sounds absolutely cringeworthy, and it hits every tranny fantasy trope there is. Of course the MtT character is beautiful (and blonde) and doesn’t look at all like a boy in a dress. {eye roll}

        And yeah, once again the trannies are allowed to get away with appalling (and illegal) behavior, with no questions asked or comments made. Deference to the dick indeed.

  25. Cee Says:


    Canada considers making criticism of gender fluidity and transsexualism a hate crime punishable by law. If you don’t like having biological men in your locker room and say so, it’s possible you may be fined and/or imprisoned. This is Orwellian to the extreme.

    Canadian women need to get organized — fast!

    • ImNoCissie Says:

      My, oh, my. Recently thought about the “pronoun policy” that NYC enacted and realized this country enslaved black people for centuries & followed it up with Jim Crow but never did the dismantling of slavery outlaw any slurs nor require that black folks be addressed in a certain way by anyone.

      Fetishists/mental ill dysphorics deserve legislated deference from the rest of the population, though.

      Admittedly, Canada’s hate speech laws are stricter than those in the U.S. so perhaps this is more consistent with their policies and protections for other groups.

      However, if the Canadian law is rigid enough to prohibit criticism in service to women’s rights advocacy, it is bullshit.

      • red Says:

        “Admittedly, … stricter.” Don’t be ridiculous. They can call me a bitch and and a cunt and I have no viable recourse. What am I going to do, make a citizen’s arrest and ask the sicko to please wait until the cops come?

      • rheapdx1 Says:

        Let alone, also outlawing a ‘panic defense’ if one fears that after being ‘tricked’ (as in possibly deceived or robbed in a public setting…club, store, etc) by a snowflake…they have to react via an act of self defense. But profiling based on race is still legal, in quite a few jurisdictions…even after every other incident that has been based on same. Makes one really wonder.

        @ImNoCissie I was pissed off to see this as well. The insanity has to end at some point. Lest we really head to the same type of country that existed in Europe, middle of the last century. We all know the result of that…no need for it to happen again.

  26. silverside Says:

    Here we see a prime example of how the trans rights and fathers rights/men’s rights neatly intersect. Both dismiss wife battering and child abuse as unimportant or as just lies perpetrated by “vindictive” women. Both have no problem with poor oppressed men/trans women getting massive financial rewards out of proportion to what women get (look up the reprehensible stats on how women, who represent most writers, are still published less, get less money, get less critical recognition relative to men, etc. Guess our transgender friend here was totally okay with getting paid and fawned over like a male writer. No complaint there. ) And finally, both groups agree that wife beaters, rapists, and child abusers should still have EQUAL CUSTODY, meaning mothers are not able to protect their own children, though they will be blamed for any tragic results. Supervised visitation with an abuser, especially when he is supervised by his own relatives (who usually are in denial about the abuse) is total bullshit. The reality is that it’s not even necessary for the child to have been directly abused. Or even directly observed the father abusing the mother (though most do). The father has traumatized the mother, the child’s major caregiver, and that in and of itself is a form of child abuse. In addition, the child is re-traumatized every time he or she is forced to spend time with Daddy, and have what he or she has experienced or witnesses denied as if it had never happened. It’s pure gaslighting and mental abuse. Why am I not surprised that this father has never spent a day in jail for violence or rape, but instead gets rewarded at every turn: fawned over by editors and critics, big financial windfall, joint custody, the works. Same male shit, just different pronoun use.

    • Zemskull Says:

      Hi Silverside: It’s even more dire than that. Women’s professional organizations, including the writing groups, are now not only welcoming in MTTs, they’re giving them free/discount memberships, scholarships and admissions to conventions in the name of “diversity.”

  27. southwest88 Says:

    So this guy is STILL at large? I have heard that the Mounties “always get their man” so I hope he gets apprehended some day but I wonder if the Mounties are being ordered to look for a “woman” and if the Canadian version of wanted posters describe the arsonist as a “woman” – is that helping him evade capture?

  28. Trish Says:

    Just have to say – the photo at the top of this article could be useful as a substitute for ipecac.

  29. rheapdx1 Says:

    @GallusMag Not wanting to derail this in the slightest, but this morning NPR [‘The Takeaway’]was bringing up the issue of gender identity and violence, self-hatred and its possible role in the Orlando shooting. And in this way, it dovetails on what happened in Montreal.

    Maybe it is just you, me, others here as well as the mounting evidence (which you and others have mentioned in great exacting detail)….but it seems once again that these issues are intertwined. Denial by snowflake to the contrary.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: