Dana Nessel 2018

December 2, 2017

The world’s first transracial children’s book for transracial children. Brought to you by TransFilipino TransWoman ‘Ja Du’ (otherwise known as white male Adam Wheeler), who runs a Trans Racialism Support Group on Facebook. Enjoy!

https://www.mystorybook.com/books/326796/

Keep repeating this.

 

Trans women are women. Say that over and over. And over.

What is a woman? A woman is anyone who identifies as a woman. What are they identifying “as”? That is different for each person. Woman is defined in a unique way by every self-identified woman, as long as those definitions do not include the reproductive biology of sexual dimorphism, which is a social construct. Women are not female, because some people classified as female are men, who are male.

But Trans women are female and Trans men are male. Because women are female, and men are male. Female and male are not biological categories denoting reproductive specificity because there are no such stable categories. And if there were, it would be wrong to name them, because identifying any category of humans with a term based on a physical characteristic they all share (tall, diabetic, brunette) erases their humanity and reduces them to nothing but that characteristic. Also categorizing people based on sex is salacious and untoward because you’re referring to their genitals. Which you shouldn’t do. How rude! What is wrong with you? Female and male have a unique meaning for everyone who identifies as such, one that is unrelated to lowly and salacious mammalian sexual categories, which don’t exist outside our wrongful attempt to create them. There are no does and bucks. Only deer. Some with front holes, others with rape sticks.

 

 

Trans women are women. Trans women are female. Trans men are men. Trans men are male. Repeat that a few times.

Woman is defined in a unique way by every person who identifies as such, except never in relation to reproductive biology, and never in relation to coercively imposed sex stereotypical behaviors such as elaborate grooming regimes, impractical clothing, and shoes which handicap the wearer. These are optional expressions of womanhood, not a defining feature of women, which is a category of person with no universally coherent definition.

Woman is also never defined by “femininity”, a cluster of trained social behaviors that are enforced upon uterus-havers from birth based on reproductive biology: compulsory emotional labor, showing teeth, feigned incompetence, deference to males.  This conduct is quite literally compelled under force of  violence upon uterus-having people from birth, in order to ritualize their perpetual submission to the penis-havers and maintain the social order of male supremacy over females. But for people with penises they may be optional self-expressions of what woman, which has no universal or objective traits, is.

 

 

To recap: Trans Women Are Women! Trans Women Are Female! Woman has no particular characteristic or definition beyond identification with an unspecified state of being, which is also called female, which is also lacking in defined meaning. Sex stereotypes enforced on people who gestate offspring in order to ritualize their subordination to the people who cannot, are optional forms of expression of this state.

There is only one form of womanhood that exists as a clearly defined class of people with shared embodiment and experience, and unless you are a fucking TERF you know for damn sure it ain’t the lowly gestating front-hole havers.

Trans Women Are Women and Trans Women Are Female but Female Women Can Not Be Trans Women.

All people can be women. All women are female. All women, including penis-havers and uterus owners are female and can be trans. Woman, Female, and Trans, are self-defined categories with no universal meaning or definition and no shared experience or embodiment. People who identify as women can also identify as trans. But only women born with dick and balls form a cohesive class of women whose shared biology and cultural experience must be named and respected.

You will respect the terms as defined by your penis-having overlords!

Sex matters, but only for those people whose humanity really counts: Men.

 

Gatekeeping Exclusionary Radical Trans!

 

 

Sure out sucks that you will be erased

 

Uterus owners must not speak over the penis havers for any reason!

 

A gender-conforming heterosexual vagina haver weighs in

 

Irony! Man who claims “female” and “woman” have no meaning demands exclusionary assignation.

 

Lesbians oppressing males by inventing the term “femme” for gay female experience decades ago.

 

Related: Women who perform in drag is “cultural appropriation” of the men who impersonate them:

https://www.theodysseyonline.com/why-cis-female-drag-queens-are-form-of-cultural-appropriation

 

Men who identify as trans women have a shared material reality, with specific dynamics, health issues and discrimination, unlike actual women.

 

The important thing here is that that men have the right to name and define their experience and women do not.

 

Trans pioneer Leslie Feinberg was a transgender woman.

 

Leslie Feinberg was a feminist piece of shit in desperate need of attention, according to this poster.

 

 

It makes his stomach turn when any woman, including trans, speaks over a man.

 

LOL. wow.

 

Naming himself as a woman takes nothing away from actual women. Check.

 

Defend the boundaries! LOL silly women.

 

Only men who identify as trans women can be transfeminine, because “femininity” is not an acceptable identification for trans men.

 

Male AFAB Trans Exclusioners (MATES). It’s a Dick and Balls Owner Thing.

 

Women no longer have the right to a word to identify ourselves, because men demanded the right to our name. Men are now women. “Female” no longer describes our demographic because men demanded that we should never, ever be discussed or identified or named under any circumstance. We are the people who must no longer be named.

Men are now female. All men have the right to be recorded as female for our highest honors “Woman of the Year” (Bruce Jenner) and “Top Woman Director in Hollywood” (Andy Wachowski) and “Highest Earning Female CEO” (Martin Rothblatt). They skew our crime statistics with their over represented male violence recategorized as female. All of this is supported at the highest levels of male dominated media, government, medicine and industry.

But they cry, lord how they cry, when female members of their own transgender community take their self-identification rhetoric to heart.

There’s been thousands of male “transwomen” proxies taking women’s places. Lets see how these men react if women do the same.

Boo fucking hoo.

 

Petition started by New York composer Karl Michael Johnson

 

“Dear Board of Directors,

This past weekend, Amy Siskind published a tweet using the term “transgenders” to refer to people in the trans community, a term commonly regarded as a slur. She was gently asked to find another term by Shakina Nayfack, a trans actress and activist. The desired outcome was that Amy would acknowledge the error and correct it. Instead, she told Shakina to “get off her timeline” and blocked her on Twitter.

Moreover, when others joined the conversation, Amy indicated that the criticism was invalid and a waste of her time, and she blocked many people who escalated the issue by responding to other tweets in her timeline. Refusing to take the criticisms in stride, she doubled down, referring to her critics sarcastically as “geniuses” and likening their behavior to that of “alt-right trolls.”

We find it troubling and shameful that this is the behavior of someone with a prominent platform in the name of an organization that claims to be “a voice for all women.” Additionally, someone who decries President Trump’s tactics of demeaning his enemies and blocking communication with them should be expected, at the very least, to choose to interact differently with her critics than the very authoritarian figure she claims to rebuke.

We believe that the true enemies of the advancement of all women are not those at the top of government making obvious policy changes affecting women’s rights, but those taking on the role of allyship who, being in a position to be trusted and depended on, make it abundantly clear that their need to be correct is worth more than continuing to develop a coalition with the very people whose voices they claim to elevate. Amy Siskind has communicated to the trans community that she is unwilling to listen; and, in fact, is willing to reproduce President Trump’s authoritarian tactics in the service of silencing her critics.

We urge you to insist on a public, sincere apology from Amy Siskind to Shakina Nayfack and the many others who have lent their emotional resources to resolve this matter. If you don’t, you risk positioning The New Agenda as a trans-excluding feminist movement that will be held to account for claiming to be “a voice for all women”, which would be a travesty to all those who trust your organization to amplify their voices.

Sincerely,

The Undersigned

This petition will be delivered to:

Vice President, The New Agenda
Karen Gerringer

Secretary, The New Agenda
Lauren D. Myers

Board Member, The New Agenda
Heather Capell Bramble

Board Member, The New Agenda
Sadaf Jaffer

Treasurer, The New Agenda
Marla Isackson

VP Outreach, The New Agenda
Paul Kingsley”

https://www.change.org/p/karen-gerringer-demand-an-apology-from-amy-siskind-to-the-trans-community

[Petition authored by New York male composer Karl Michael Johnson.

Karl tweets at https://twitter.com/KarlSaintLucy

Bolding by me.-GM]

Archive:  Read the rest of this entry »

God this is good. Mancheeze critiques some YouTube dickhead’s video about how much he hates women and how women should pretend otherwise. I watched his video last week and it was as boring and offensive as you’d expect, but I could listen to Mancheeze go on forever. I nearly busted a gut laughing my ass off. She killed it. Five stars! True feminist entertainment.

.

 

credit: dykememes420